Re: [mpls] Correction - IPR poll on draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-lsp-ping

[Mach Chen <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

I am not aware of any IPR related to this document.

Best regards,
Mach

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loa Andersson [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 4:34 PM
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail];
> [e-mail]
> Subject: Correction - [mpls] IPR poll on draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-lsp-ping
> 
> Folks,
> 
> One of the authors of the document has found an error with the text of the IPR
> Poll mail, thanks Nagendra! When you respond to the IPR poll please respond
> to this mail (nothing bad will happen if you respond to the original mail :) ).
> 
> The correct text should be:
> 
> Working Group,
> 
> We have started to prepare draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-lsp-ping for working
> group adoption poll (can I use the abbreviation wgap?)
> 
> We will start with the IPR poll and then MPLS-RT and the poll.
> 
> This mail starts the IPR poll.
> 
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring- lsp-ping?
> 
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs
> 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
> 
> There no IPR disclosures filed against this document.
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this
> email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. *The
> response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The document will not
> advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author
> and contributor.
> 
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that
> has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
> 
> 
> /Loa
> mpls wg co-chair