Re: [mpls] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-retire-ach-tlv
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 28 June 2013 12:25 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6138921F9546; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 05:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.166
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.166 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.433, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pfy-U4e8o1Mf; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 05:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (asmtp4.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135A421F847A; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 05:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r5SCPQFv008067; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:25:26 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r5SCPPYA008018 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:25:26 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Loa Andersson' <loa@pi.nu>, mpls@ietf.org, pwe3@ietf.org
References: <51B9BE97.2090103@pi.nu> <51CD64A1.4010408@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <51CD64A1.4010408@pi.nu>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:25:21 +0100
Message-ID: <001401ce73fa$8f45d620$add18260$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHW5VCOalYSNbB9yB8pqvNYs+N7SwKMkCermSXElDA=
Content-Language: en-gb
Cc: mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org, pwe3-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-retire-ach-tlv
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:25:39 -0000
> However TLVs might be carried in the GACh messages, the disticnction > is not entirely clear in the draft, can the authors please make > this clear. Happily. The current version defines "ACH TLV" as "TLV constructs that can be carried in messages on the G-ACh by placing them in the ACH between the fixed header fields and the G-ACh message." Thus, retiring ACH TLVs, obviously means only removing this concept and not any other TLV-related concept. I would propose to change the last sentence of Section 1 as follows: OLD This document states that ACH TLVs as specified in RFC 5586 are not useful and might be harmful. It updates RFC 5586 by deprecating the ACH TLV and updating the associated IANA registries as described in Section 4 of this document. NEW This document states that ACH TLVs as specified in RFC 5586 are not useful and might be harmful. It updates RFC 5586 by deprecating the ACH TLV and updating the associated IANA registries as described in Section 4 of this document. This document makes no comment about the use of TLVs in other places. In particular, proposals to use TLVs within ACH messages, or as an appendage to ACH messages are not in scope of this document. END Does that work? Thanks, Adrian
- [mpls] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls… Loa Andersson
- [mpls] Closed - Re: Working Group Last Call on dr… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] Closed - Re: Working Group Last Call o… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] [PWE3] Working Group Last Call on draf… Andrew G. Malis