[mpls] Request for comments on 'draft-cheng-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection'
cheng weiqiang <chengwq@gmail.com> Mon, 22 October 2012 09:52 UTC
Return-Path: <chengwq@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F4221F8B45 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 02:52:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.349
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.349 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.250, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d8ShWRFnzlfw for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 02:52:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vb0-f44.google.com (mail-vb0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405ED21F8B3E for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 02:52:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id fc26so3015187vbb.31 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 02:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=qobwW4AZBTCERl+WDD23zGG/Bxt8eu0jKoYliuACkmw=; b=a4Ph4WfIP/SjyG9iZ5pajR73dLAIMhA3Zc3WkmsJJ8cSM4IIePk8+lBf5mzUFV7HCM 5aHwUqE1elGNKSOKHbaO4DyUu5biqUhfvFNXsZgMiGoQP0rZ8OAYioazpuzP8dwjTT89 iGFNTmhWRSF/LMpXgVB8jKbf6ebsW210HqTUGDT+tdip3TqQHdPPqgsZ87hcBsj+rdQy 83ZbPmAX8MdwXoccFSanfOABFSmZmqMkqwdEe5CtXO+/KRtrPm2rfXYiGRA53ytni2sJ wwf+kFGqwpmmhakBxwJbBLpaEGUvm9BE/rvrg2zfJF/hLMxIU7m+C29VBH4rSmb00Hdm Ih8Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.59.5.229 with SMTP id cp5mr14942318ved.32.1350899537663; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 02:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.28.210 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 02:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:52:17 +0800
Message-ID: <CABYGD0FhyKmve9374wN88JtNWsZX4_VPdR0++9=UEFLLCgg9VQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: cheng weiqiang <chengwq@gmail.com>
To: mpls@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: draft-cheng-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] Request for comments on 'draft-cheng-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection'
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 09:52:18 -0000
Hello, Recently, the topics on ring topology-specific protection for MPLS-TP are discussed frequently. It will help operators to deploy a simple and effective protection as that in SDH/Sonet. In this case, we have written a draft on ring topology-specific optimized protection mechanism in following link. It can cover multiple adjacent nodes and links failures. The number of LSP on the Ring is O(2N) (N is Node number) for both P2P wrapping solution and steering solution. Hope you could kindly help to review and comment it. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-cheng-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-00.txt Thanks a lot for your kind review. Best regards, Weiqiang Cheng