Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-flow-ident

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <> Mon, 24 October 2016 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CDCB1298C2; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.951
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.951 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fTcXEI3CSGID; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81D071298C3; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=6278; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1477323814; x=1478533414; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=EJtw3CtAogJnU15mteC768qMc/avk80l0kQ7QgeKYkc=; b=LgRbOaV7dllIvh3uWlg+N/Gpie0pZdDqeR6IZz+ijRaCwUwPFgvPISuq kb39BFw+c0oC3SfWtOYinhKAk4BmLXQUfepwXYR50scdJFo/ntzA8ciXW FdMkqy9/zJ1GVg9gy0qad1S78PjJEinUpt2QMxBzBL93FHbXjW/IcXFRc I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AEAgC3Kw5Y/5RdJa1cGwEBAQMBAQEJA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBgyoBAQEBAR1YfY00nlqHS4UWggccAQqFegKBZj8UAQIBAQEBAQEBYiiEYwE?= =?us-ascii?q?BBAEBAWsGBRACAQg/ByEGCxQRAgQOBRuIHQMXDr1VDYNlAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBFwWGPYF9gliCR4FSEQGDTIIvBZQ3hSg1AYx5gxmBboRtiSeIbIQ?= =?us-ascii?q?ahAABHjZeglmCKXKGIYIgAQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,542,1473120000"; d="scan'208,217";a="337727151"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Oct 2016 15:43:33 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u9OFhX8v002916 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:43:33 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:43:32 -0400
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:43:32 -0400
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <>
To: Greg Mirsky <>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-flow-ident
Thread-Index: AQHSLB2APKcCvfFqXUilu+gbu5qkz6C3nlaAgABkyID//79mBQ==
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:43:32 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>, <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7E688250218F477F955BE1BA843140F6ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Cc: "" <>, "" <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-flow-ident
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:43:38 -0000


I know of no IPR applicable directly to this document. I know there is disclosed IPR against solutions.

Thumb typed by Carlos Pignataro.
Excuze typofraphicak errows

On Oct 24, 2016, at 08:34, Greg Mirsky <<>> wrote:

Dear All,
I'm not aware of any IPR other than mentioned by Stewart.


On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:34 AM, Stewart Bryant <<>> wrote:
There is IPR on the SL work which follows on from this (already declared against those documents).

This text calls up  draft-tempia-ippm-p3m-03 which has IPR, whether it needs to be formally declared I leave to the chairs to decide.

I know of no other IPR that relates directly to this document.


On 22/10/2016 05:33, Loa Andersson wrote:
Working Group,

We are currently preparing draft-ietf-mpls-flow-ident-02 for working
group last call. We will do an IPR poll prior to the wglc.

This is to start the IPR Poll.

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-flow-ident?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

There is no IPR disclosure filed directly against this documents.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The
document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

mpls wg co-chair

mpls mailing list<>