Re: [mpls] Closed - Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-retire-ach-tlv

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 28 June 2013 12:32 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7754021F9634; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 05:32:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.274
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.274 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.325, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NpiS1oN8GIXW; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 05:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.159]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45E821F9DD4; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 05:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r5SCW1vT018357; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:32:02 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r5SCVwfM018292 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:31:59 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Loa Andersson' <loa@pi.nu>, mpls@ietf.org, pwe3@ietf.org
References: <51B9BE97.2090103@pi.nu> <51CD6580.3080901@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <51CD6580.3080901@pi.nu>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:31:54 +0100
Message-ID: <001801ce73fb$7ad1d300$70757900$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHW5VCOalYSNbB9yB8pqvNYs+N7SwMSMUR2mSGZoKA=
Content-Language: en-gb
Cc: mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org, pwe3-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] Closed - Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-retire-ach-tlv
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:32:19 -0000

> Working Group,
> 
> this working group last call, very few comments, can the authors
> please make the updates needed; and tell the the wg and wg chairs
> that the draft is ready to be sent to the IESG with a request for
> publication.

Working on this.
I see comments from Loa (separate response sent).
I believe all other comments came in before WG last call (e.g. review team
comments) and were addressed. If anyone disagrees, please shout.

> Testing the water:
> 
> We can't see that an implementation poll on this draft is necessary.
> Anyone that think we need to do that?

That's amusing. I can confirm I have 237 implementations of not using the ACH
TLV  :-)
They do not all interoperate! In particular, I am having trouble to get my
refrigerator to television with my cat (people who know me well will understand
why this is).

Thanks,
Adrian