Re: [mpls] Working Group Adoption Poll (WGAP) on draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Wed, 22 December 2021 18:05 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D2583A048B; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 10:05:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pEheb3hmWS9I; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 10:05:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52e.google.com (mail-ed1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75CAD3A04BB; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 10:05:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id o6so11858040edc.4; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 10:05:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3Hi8kSAVirMusTGCMho8YyMHtICGfHyFI+V36zRnQko=; b=BMcQXZeji0liP3j29RVyutGE3cb4DMLA86eg9yIqIbgO14gjwg7gNVR0yNoOfESpyl 9gSThsT82OHraA9KYf1kxAKDR8fGyM5KWsa6J8w7PbrEMtgttKEerQxmg3z4D9TrQL2m X4WzKsTZzXExeVFtMBZC652Fb5ZsMe8Sn+1BHfEnoSqevDMRe1ScZxbzK7PIXhoabXBx FWmmxEFmG/Xr+eMjc+mgigXIkdnGjjUGf7pQ5u/vacz0+4PWHt5yWVUuxkXBWRZuu/xA OpsxNQFmpCJMRImm6QpVJm4tQ/SLdKIPy+W/TRf7A+PIzrEVa7rNq2FBRhe/G6JPFZJk et0g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3Hi8kSAVirMusTGCMho8YyMHtICGfHyFI+V36zRnQko=; b=NhmIVnWoIFoS94TtwfcUsTf5BuaywcSgLbTRQyOxYWvXK66gQAtjaliewnrh/64C10 LPALzCy7a05ulghJ8H48Paem9/iExJPGEVGy3tQWxYAsAVZ/AaZg7h9y54JZlKnr6Sdz 3x7UKs8ZOkgb/buWWapk6CRTEn0AePQ6mdR+WeROU0IOO4rfCOPDZkDUijHEm3aVPGr3 iKDxOpgrD5LXwNnz7iCQ0HPj3oDSFFQxGw0Dvc6kBVQjhANjRz7/WMv7ve0WH+ZzWAS2 1ye1Oi8V8svCXlEO/7JaiGOf6ExSGA09x64YISSpusL41EUAtK9JElOAvj3ufuIWPiqT Vc6w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533mqyXA7lo+GtN+MdfXk7cZnEoyY+m6q9raGz4R6mwHZEmdrP0y nb/2gju+5r+yCmr2qF0lnQf1kE+IP+/qTCvM0qOJldnP
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyKxiOwahZLwp8EDn7NAbidxWixRB6mXVh+v27BuzGcwu9FRDMDvNCUKS3pCCXZSDeloFUvV4BglDds5bun8wU=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:dc14:: with SMTP id b20mr3867760edu.133.1640196341816; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 10:05:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <8cfdc537-27da-240e-be9e-835b0d5fc82d@pi.nu> <93117e385f944efeadf5c1e6eb954e1e@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <93117e385f944efeadf5c1e6eb954e1e@huawei.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 10:05:30 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmWqe8Kz5SEm9R1fRK-Wnc2S-W3JXAzd8VuMfEhEys9E5Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
Cc: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd@ietf.org" <draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000050e08605d3bff84a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/600XXJ5c9zrOQsMGg1IxBzWJZaY>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Working Group Adoption Poll (WGAP) on draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 18:05:50 -0000

Hi Jie,
thank you for your kind words and suggestions. Will work on adding the
figure to the draft. In case of the Non-IP encapsulation of Multipoint BFD,
the Source Address TLV is considered as part of the message on the message
on the new Generalized Associated Channel Type (Multipoint BFD Session).
That message includes BFD Control message and the Source Address TLV. We'll
display these =lements in the new figure.

Happy Holidays to All!

Kind regards,
Greg

On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 7:14 PM Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com> wrote:

> Hi Loa,
>
> I've read this document and support its adoption.
>
> I have one comment which could be resolved either before or after the
> adoption.
>
> Section 3.2 describes the Non-IP Encapsulation of Multipoint BFD, in which
> a new ACH channel type is defined, and it says a Source Address TLV MUST
> immediately follow a BFD control message.
>
> I'd suggest to provide a figure of the packet format of non-IP Multipoint
> BFD encapsulation. And one related question is: is the source address TLV
> considered as part of the Multipoint BFD packet or not?
>
> Best regards,
> Jie
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 6:36 AM
> > To: mpls@ietf.org
> > Cc: draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@ietf.org
> > Subject: [mpls] Working Group Adoption Poll (WGAP) on
> > draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd
> >
> > Working Group,
> >
> > This is to start a two week poll on adopting
> >   draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd
> > as a MPLS working group document.
> >
> > Though "two weeks" brings all the way into the holiday season. so it
> will be a
> > bit longer.
> >
> > Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> > group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical motivation
> for your
> > support/not support, especially if you think that the document should
> not be
> > adopted as a working group document.
> >
> > There is no IPRs disclosure against this document.
> >
> > The authors have all stated on the MPLS wg mailing list that they are
> > unaware of any IPRs that relates to this document.
> >
> > The working group adoption poll ends January 4, 2022.
> >
> > /Loa
> > --
> > Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
> > Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
> > Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpls mailing list
> > mpls@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>