Re: [mpls] end of WGLC, RE: working group last call for draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple-01

Nobo

I was struck by Adrian's comment which, if I understand correctly, was
what to do if a MUST or SHOULD is violated and as I see it, I am unclear
if this was addressed.

Thus 3.2 2) what should a recipient do when the echo reply does contain
a Reply Mode Order TLV ?

Or in 6), 'SHOULD contain at least two Reply Mode values' - when may
that SHOULD be violated and if it is, does that render the TLV not valid
as described in 4?

Tom Petch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nobo Akiya" <nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com>
To: "Ross Callon" <rcallon@juniper.net>
Cc: <mpls@ietf.org>; <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>;
<draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple@tools.ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: [mpls] end of WGLC, RE: working group last call for
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple-01

> Hi Ross,
>
> Thank you for Shepherding this document.
>
> We (authors) have posted the revision (-02) addressing all comments
> received during the LC of this document (thanks to those who provided
> comments!).
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Nobo, on behalf of authors
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>
wrote:
>
> >  This working group last call has ended, with sufficient support and
no
> > opposition. There have however been a number of comments received.
Thanks
> > to everyone who took the time to review the draft and comment.
> >
> >
> >
> > Authors, please update the draft in response to the comments. After
this
> > is done, I will submit the document for publication.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks, Ross
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Ross
Callon
> > *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 10:04 AM
> > *To:* mpls@ietf.org
> > *Cc:* Loa Andersson; mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org
> > *Subject:* [mpls] working group last call for
> > draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple-01
> >
> >
> >
> > Working Group,
> >
> >
> >
> > This is to initiate a working group last call on
> > draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple-01.
> >
> > Because this WGLC will span the IETF in Dallas, it will be extended
to
> > three weeks.
> >
> >
> >
> > Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list
(mpls@ietf.org).
> >
> >
> >
> > There are no IPR disclosures against this document. All the authors
have
> > stated that they
> >
> > are not aware of any IPR that relates to this draft.
> >
> >
> >
> > This working group last call ends Friday  April 10, 2015.
> >
> >
> >
> > Ross
> >
> > for the MPLS WG chairs
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>