Re: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-09.txt
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sat, 20 February 2021 07:48 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7523A0A65; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 23:48:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JTgCFPciup2S; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 23:48:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9ACD3A0A63; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 23:48:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (unknown [124.104.184.212]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 57A89326109; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 08:48:33 +0100 (CET)
To: mpls@ietf.org, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, rtg-ads@ietf.org, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org>
References: <161380545505.32150.2225179477575760602@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <849a08c3-f38b-c9a9-49b4-05d33fcd2fe1@pi.nu>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 15:48:28 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <161380545505.32150.2225179477575760602@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/64Mqjqh8cu5Pvq-TVN_PpzPIoDM>
Subject: Re: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-09.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 07:48:41 -0000
All, I have posted version -09 of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update, thise version addresses all comments from the IETF LC and the IESG review. Both discusses and Comments. One thing I have not done is updating section "1.2.1. Terminology Used in this Document", the section is not a general terminology update and is clearly marked as valid for this document only. RFC 8126 is clear in what it says, but does not discuss registry hierarchies. I have an MPLS IANA registries in the pipe, once this one is closed. We could follow that one up with a generic IANA registries terminology if there are interest. I believe that the Discusses can be cleared now. /Loa On 20/02/2021 15:17, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching WG of the IETF. > > Title : Updating the IANA MPLS LSP Ping Parameters > Authors : Loa Andersson > Mach Chen > Carlos Pignataro > Tarek Saad > Filename : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-09.txt > Pages : 37 > Date : 2021-02-19 > > Abstract: > This document updates RFC 8029 and RFC 8611 which both define IANA > registries for MPLS Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping. It also updates > the description of the procedures for the responses sent when an > unknown or erroneous code point is found. > > The updates are to clarify and align this namespace with recent > developments, e.g. new RFCs using the new registration procedure > terminology from RFC 8126 (e.g. RFC 8611) instead of the terminology > from the obsoleted RFC 5226. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update/ > > There are also htmlized versions available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-09 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-09 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-09 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > > _______________________________________________ > I-D-Announce mailing list > I-D-Announce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html > or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt > -- Loa Andersson email: loa@pi.nu Senior MPLS Expert loa.pi.nu@gmail.com Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64
- [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-regis… internet-drafts
- Re: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-r… Loa Andersson