Re: [mpls] Correction - IPR poll on draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-lsp-ping

I am not aware of any IPR related to this document.

Thanks
Sri

On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 1:33 AM, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> One of the authors of the document has found an error with the text
> of the IPR Poll mail, thanks Nagendra! When you respond to the IPR poll
> please respond to this mail (nothing bad will happen if you respond
> to the original mail :) ).
>
> The correct text should be:
>
> Working Group,
>
> We have started to prepare draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-lsp-ping for
> working group adoption poll (can I use the abbreviation wgap?)
>
> We will start with the IPR poll and then MPLS-RT and the poll.
>
> This mail starts the IPR poll.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-
> lsp-ping?
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> There no IPR disclosures filed against this document.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
> IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The
> document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
> received from each author and contributor.
>
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>
> /Loa
> mpls wg co-chair
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>