IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] MPLS-RT review of draft-zzhang-mpls-rmr-multicast

Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com> Mon, 08 April 2019 09:58 UTC

Return-Path: <huubatwork@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7EDA12006D; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 02:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.026
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.026 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_DISPTO=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SK0oY4Py_Ngo; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 02:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com (mail-ed1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F93D1200B8; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 02:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id s16so11098490edr.3; Mon, 08 Apr 2019 02:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=reply-to:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :disposition-notification-to:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4wFL06R3zYgwcF39ZA2u+a+vCexn81JTC6KqhswxpZE=; b=jb3NeiSo1Xgzowdi4mOAkp2Z4DwOn0fvMBwrld4pMzbocE4DO+kKuNbN8P65OX3G5w rI68Q7FBsUffDdWQCOzFz2lncKbDEr2kiREt31EP+4f3+4QHtabg3dFpdktP+mFqjzvy FXmyBPGkH1KJht2ZfnckRfsccSDIlw23OFDGPbq2gBL2E1zFZUdO0eNeYlfVc2rqndFA bufUOkPMNZ433+T34AB+To4UI2zxsrfJBbRO8v+D84zUOciA12ysqEa/mwxBlal1oAU/ rDswhHgoykjD93aGyDAS1W6MkZKL+5nss3izsNeeqxDCtFW34K/VoYjoVXDgDhpHU0UK yclA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:subject:to:cc:references:from :message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4wFL06R3zYgwcF39ZA2u+a+vCexn81JTC6KqhswxpZE=; b=AvacC1F4Y5geNjSH/jCQNuINAFzyj9UkrUnZBJ/iBPGllPBXrITrVwe7N1dyhllpSN +kOr7BOE4nA2r72iYih9YP0gWLL3opAuvKzz72+VHGyOiPkamfHJwRjUiM+EgHZPDtYy rYwfoOzcifaxUfyHeXtWLc2573mIANEMcN54OYZBzzojKXAmsaAVXef1BpnaCf8cpxxo FBzb7j76ZAo7D7NqGY5I9ci/jRSVcpa6lbyPZ4IKVrnpc5CfJMZx7X+oAyTRsJrRz2Ku qj0BQ7wrtcs5Tr4awgWD9YZQbk5mJWWy+LrFKiBfxRc6notyykuv+Nci3gVuelyPZ+rs T4Cg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXz3GDJgooNL18L4rQFj+XvxEmhoLdaw/f3JkUcxb+mkiMe+NbC dLd6u6DeXdxgHAgGoxnVLH4/HvTU
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxru9h3whrcmoVU9qEVX5Pe8Ecbe4ZG7NA2e4sczfMp1sVvEYxLXGPrlK3FYI6Xf0gpbxi/eQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:81cf:: with SMTP id e15mr15600728ejx.241.1554717509766; Mon, 08 Apr 2019 02:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from McAsterix.local ([2a02:a211:8e81:2e00:d89:6d4a:d526:1a4d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e3sm8615245edb.22.2019.04.08.02.58.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Apr 2019 02:58:28 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: huubatwork@gmail.com
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-zzhang-mpls-rmr-multicast@ietf.org" <draft-zzhang-mpls-rmr-multicast@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <0df832d7-8389-e9dd-95aa-46d8c8d06da5@pi.nu>
From: Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <be4eb733-b0a2-68d6-0442-94c5129da516@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 11:58:28 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0df832d7-8389-e9dd-95aa-46d8c8d06da5@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/7FI13O67cN55RedeIk7_1oOchbY>
Subject: [mpls] MPLS-RT review of draft-zzhang-mpls-rmr-multicast
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 09:58:33 -0000

All,

I’ve been selected as an MPLS-RT reviewer for draft-zzhang-mpls-rmr-multicast,
which is currently a candidate for MPLS WG adoption.

In the abstract is stated:
   With Resilient MPLS Rings (RMR), although all existing multicast
   procedures and solutions can work as is, there are optimizations that
   could be done for RSVP-TE P2MP tunnel signaling and Fast-ReRouting
   for both mLDP and RSVP-TE P2MP tunnels.
I have carefully read the draft but I could not find any justification
for the optimisation that could be done.
I also did not find any indication how this optimisation has to be
deployed. Do all the nodes in the ring, or in the network have to
support this optimisation before it becomes effective.

I think these issues have to be documented before this draft can
be adopted as WG draft.

Best regards, Huub.

-- 
================================================================
Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email