Re: [mpls] [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-08

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 30 August 2019 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C58D120108; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 14:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=OVScQp26; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=wELCnTZZ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pUTR-lA7j5Fr; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 14:20:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D78BC120100; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 14:20:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=12033; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1567200010; x=1568409610; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=4NTMLb6XXsSQjdoFX4AimZOvssfZAhwtuPyZ6qeuS2c=; b=OVScQp26yhOkDsIZfflKc5LGvPT6SYzEuHFfjqVWMTpNhiO/cRoeOnmK PQCBtfTizwRDPyJ564DyUV9ahTj6cuX/XJn82Cawr7X0EcXa0K/BXkYVT yCw2YNaWTUmG+kCdJH4f6RZx5ns7cKoIAYm4U1yuPnd86fUIH65w4DZrg A=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AMJ5WRR2Apsb7Tef+smDT+zVfbzU7u7jyIg8e44?= =?us-ascii?q?YmjLQLaKm44pD+JxGCt+51ggrPWoPWo7JfhuzavrqoeFRI4I3J8TgZdYBUER?= =?us-ascii?q?oMiMEYhQslVceOBEDTJ//xZCt8F8NHBxdo?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BMAADjkWld/4sNJK1mHAEBAQQBAQc?= =?us-ascii?q?EAQGBUwcBAQsBgRUvUANtViAECyqEIYNHA4RShiKCXJMQhFyBLoEkA1QJAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BDAEBLQIBAYQ/GYJJIzQJDgIDCAEBBAEBAQIBBgRthS4BC4VKAQIBAxILBgo?= =?us-ascii?q?TAQE3AREBBgIRAwECJAcCBDAdCgQOBSKDAAGBHU0DHQECkl+QYQKBOIhhc4E?= =?us-ascii?q?ygnwBAQWFFxiCFgmBNAGLdxiBf4E4H4IeLj6EZIJrMoImjyiFHJdPCoIflFc?= =?us-ascii?q?bgjKHNo56jXKYRAIEAgQFAg4BAQWBUDiBWHAVOyoBgkGCQjiDOopTcoEpjg8?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,447,1559520000"; d="scan'208,217";a="317404232"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 30 Aug 2019 21:20:08 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (xch-aln-004.cisco.com [173.36.7.14]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x7ULK4ws005555 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 30 Aug 2019 21:20:06 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (173.36.7.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 16:20:03 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 16:20:02 -0500
Received: from NAM03-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 16:20:02 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=LDJ7XgzJLm8XS3dfpXfqvjZBvkaz3yAUhnH01FvORtaK9JxTQOa7ecQy/AOQD/p6Tb5fQGFreUwc7MA95elNz29Cw41I/pDM+JxR9KGOMijj7zoUajXVHuO+ljeiJJaLGY0Nc3o2YsomrFURk4qLoiSk4wHWeOZ2MVIWb2ELDH1W+acPD34FADWdDB5ZHpqDNEszhjZaE28INN67w8ttg1eyIbeh96pbtMYDJzKBeQYfupJ34CVD9pwK4V4sCaoQ/ZkN/nFHRLQ+cu4bzdXsShk6oMdDFUQHFiNvgcJ9iCNpZPFSBbcxp4c9xIrtrfPeTDLmSh7hl5Bl5KfSLFBeYQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=4NTMLb6XXsSQjdoFX4AimZOvssfZAhwtuPyZ6qeuS2c=; b=UYDnbnPTnuz4L+1sZrDaQAJl18CnSeivIhVvTBlV/gmY/ql4aLBnYrZVyX5opP6pv6hM1F1sf9xylv+LBKYuhdOCBlYbbUwMNcZaxM6S8uDNxhXzjmgrPEVjsX3GLLqThKWUgAMSnVHe3f/qyNMSDqIxxyXmcWRdwsJ2e+nIvzxIuJ9JD+TQ6KZaiw3xh5cv5TjyjeEjscE1VrhgZ3BukiH3xQdFRhTux3qHrMTqNBo4zQgxWqitcL1igNd+9rNeFRDPT9ICY7mwBf2SxT54kpvhUiYFOwGtiVPAs6UOiQsJlUrH8eyalGn7bPmGMlrRDzWAyIcIS2jYUG/flJAHFw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=4NTMLb6XXsSQjdoFX4AimZOvssfZAhwtuPyZ6qeuS2c=; b=wELCnTZZTzlPuVEw8x+b70ybm8xmKp9MTyR7iJcgJKC8qimf+JHK0DBPsGi4jsxCuqUdaiOef4/RweZhc1cIjIfpnwoKELoFv3QisHxiqivB4sYmahocU6WLQ2gBLUx2V3yapTeunGZywpXjzHnivU54ki4hMTFSjAslIPMtDe8=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.38.14) by MN2PR11MB4127.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.179.150.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2199.21; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 21:20:01 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cdc1:a2cf:eb3:a420]) by MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cdc1:a2cf:eb3:a420%6]) with mapi id 15.20.2199.021; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 21:20:01 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
CC: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "lsr-ads@ietf.org" <lsr-ads@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-08
Thread-Index: AQHVX3iumXsMmuYCp02/xpaOUCYT0w==
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 21:20:01 +0000
Message-ID: <B78AFE93-A95C-47E5-A485-7517E4011483@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=acee@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c4:1007::96]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: db069b9b-8216-4dca-819f-08d72d8fd176
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600166)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:MN2PR11MB4127;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4127:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB4127DD7E27C582D6D08FBA97C2BD0@MN2PR11MB4127.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:7691;
x-forefront-prvs: 0145758B1D
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(979002)(4636009)(376002)(39860400002)(346002)(366004)(396003)(136003)(199004)(189003)(71200400001)(54896002)(6512007)(6306002)(8936002)(450100002)(25786009)(6436002)(4326008)(53936002)(6246003)(2906002)(99286004)(486006)(81156014)(2616005)(256004)(186003)(1730700003)(81166006)(8676002)(66946007)(71190400001)(46003)(54906003)(6486002)(2351001)(476003)(5640700003)(64756008)(66446008)(66476007)(66556008)(53546011)(6506007)(7736002)(478600001)(790700001)(6116002)(2501003)(76116006)(86362001)(229853002)(33656002)(316002)(36756003)(102836004)(5660300002)(14454004)(6916009)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB4127; H:MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: iVw+7UuNORruDUB2lEzvJ/DBPJP101p8t+pIH0K5GACfG52iig49S1hcalVtQE3GRSOTyufUcBOTQ+9wYTzI+tLBxlP9V89riOX3h/W7gu5DVWjkjKJzhOZY9WV+x4mXwlPRWcULhBhhNs3QHyYHMgKJo82WvQ5ckTm3RtmPGZax+BJegZRh8M0DzIxfKfZbrz63YqZs+m0sHetxttpkSVZW9eN6OSYbv9+RIuovl9gFMm6HpDxacEFcffaun69UOMgXqy8C8AthWMvJ/XQdjyNNPQ3IyTgq5PasPhsybMQdJ+2ASOYAHtXcrTva5l6XxcjM2ypVvxOmABBdiVsgwLtSF7MVhjTY5JGgPqBpQAHA1ulDuFbW8EHB7z6mw8P762PyjHYLGUtgidkt1kJwaJHQ1I54C2H++zpNwTwIIOc=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B78AFE93A95C47E5A4857517E4011483ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: db069b9b-8216-4dca-819f-08d72d8fd176
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Aug 2019 21:20:01.2383 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: OkG5sikrMWsbbsLyBTJ4Nxi+SJbp/+KCfVjDng5vgf+l/y3Z842ggeP2C6mmsqdb
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4127
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.14, xch-aln-004.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-6.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/7Lw2wJlCxGg79898nQLaJrWBhL0>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-08
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 21:20:13 -0000

Speaking as a WG member (and someone who has followed this discussion for some time):

I support publication of this document. I have a couple minor comments:


  1.  Please use the US English form of  “Signaling” consistently. Right now there is a mix of “Signalling” and “Signaling”.
  2.  Why does this referred to stacked LSPs? I think it could be applicable to a single LSP.
  3.  In the “Security Considerations”, please say the considerations of draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-12 are also applicable.

Thanks,
Acee

From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org>; on behalf of Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>;
Date: Friday, August 30, 2019 at 3:42 PM
To: "lsr@ietf.org"; <lsr@ietf.org>;
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org"; <mpls@ietf.org>;, "lsr-ads@ietf.org"; <lsr-ads@ietf.org>;, "draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc@ietf.org"; <draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc@ietf.org>;
Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-08

We’ve gone through a number of iterations with these ELC drafts and I believe they are ready and meets all the use case requirements. Note that “Entropy Label for Spring tunnels” – draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-12 is on the RFC editor’s queue.
This begins a two week last call for the subject draft. Please indicate your support or objection on this list prior to 12:00 AM UTC on Sept 14th, 2014.
Thanks,
Acee