Re: [mpls] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology.txt

[Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>]

Nic,

I'm not aware of any IPR that relates to this draft.


/Loa

On 17/02/2020 23:23, [e-mail] wrote:
> Dear Working Group,
> 
> We are currently preparing draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology for working 
> group last call.
> 
> Part of this preparation is to do an IPR poll.
> 
> This mail is to start the IPR poll.
> 
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology?
> 
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules 
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
> 
> There are no IPR disclosure directly against 
> draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology.
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to 
> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
> IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS WG mailing list.* The 
> document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been 
> received from each author and contributor.
> 
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or 
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any 
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
> 
> Best regards
> 
>     Nic
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: [phone]