Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10.txt> (Relayed Echo Reply mechanism for LSP Ping) to Proposed Standard

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Mon, 28 September 2015 15:01 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A6D1AC399; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 08:01:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s9F3dxeOR6fP; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 08:01:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AD3D1ABD3C; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 08:01:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so105302353wic.0; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 08:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=QFT4PmMEC1op/qrwWLomk7gRJCuPLyMJTsyuCiZXxI8=; b=CCVLj5i+Rc3JZ9/nd2+7Csr1G7BHUDoeY74ftxqzhXH6d/I8ipcKD3aT2lKhU62FUo x0wAU1tRaLydF0mUIuL9RsFDK3xKwT5wPxceS/Yi04zX26gP0fKE3IyVJ7NlLIecDjWP D8YlukpS5hjOm3wI809JV8c4GFsvuW4HnjTf3Bo9ZNiN2r/dnrfq/DosEskoWDK4iVjk u12DDbVEcLTALmUv3zdec2UUDFDz6dMghL5qSac2cD/aQFakNo9irxAxO50qA/ocAUhn /kiTSVNy+QxwE+qdIEyPbJtttPeMqzivLJqy0rm0jOsnQcwX6vQtyD8KvmvdP7bFxL9q fsJw==
X-Received: by 10.194.206.38 with SMTP id ll6mr12502490wjc.116.1443452459547; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 08:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.9.212 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 08:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU30D_YoHHx3DWEQBS-7ZnDfWmF=oEt4v43QSNQNdhS2vA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA=duU0u44mjZ+oTC+7x3r8uhWvBUbniFshw-1sVaM0FFBSAoQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAH==cJxBEHp18dkmKfvVCiohG1u=pj-FLPX2hTMckHF5btSL3w@mail.gmail.com> <CAA=duU30D_YoHHx3DWEQBS-7ZnDfWmF=oEt4v43QSNQNdhS2vA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:00:40 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU1z+hLZ759TJtjRZOK0s8OsajHcLdzQ0Z-OfKvFgrD_QQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lizhong Jin <lizho.jin@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7ba9801c1a023f0520cff7ce
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/7RquzFrCHuptJcBkhMM4eqCVN5M>
Cc: "rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply.all@ietf.org, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10.txt> (Relayed Echo Reply mechanism for LSP Ping) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 15:01:02 -0000

Lizhong,

Responding to myself, I just saw Joel's email, so we're both good with this
addition.

Thanks,
Andy

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com> wrote:

> Lizhong,
>
> [Lizhong] I proposed to add the following, and waiting for his
>> confirmation.
>> This stack grows downward, with relay node addresses further along the
>> LSP appearing lower down in the stack. Please refer to section 4.2 for
>> the relay node discovery mechanism.
>>
>
> If this is acceptable to Joel, I'm good with it as well.
>
> Thanks,
> Andy
>
>
>