[mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-14

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Mon, 27 February 2017 20:21 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E42212A316; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:21:24 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
To: <gen-art@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.46.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148822688424.13746.15775745274859586475.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:21:24 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/7Wj405jStAJjTBEd978h-_CbIOU>
Cc: mpls@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-14
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 20:21:24 -0000

Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-14
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 2017-02-27
IETF LC End Date: 2017-01-17
IESG Telechat date: 2017-03-02

Summary: (Still) Ready.

My comments have been addressed.

There were some fairly big changes for a document in IETF LC that came
in with this version
based on feedback from the call for review from several other working
groups.  The new text
looks ok to me.