Re: [mpls] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip-03

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 05 March 2019 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B61131065; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 13:35:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kfITMclLoLBY; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 13:35:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BDB3130DEF; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 13:35:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x25LZAeU006377; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 21:35:10 GMT
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000B722044; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 21:35:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDD6E22042; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 21:35:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([87.112.237.8]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x25LZ8dw022149 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Mar 2019 21:35:09 GMT
Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Datatracker on behalf of Martin Stiemerling'" <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>, <tsv-art@ietf.org>
Cc: <mpls@ietf.org>, <ietf@ietf.org>, <draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip.all@ietf.org>
References: <155182102765.27824.6348634481043936612@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <155182102765.27824.6348634481043936612@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 21:35:08 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <020a01d4d39b$4e92c460$ebb84d20$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQH2Qj+Sv2A2/J/rvZAZjZIPktu+aaW6r8DA
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 87.112.237.8
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-24472.002
X-TM-AS-Result: No--4.173-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--4.173-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-24472.002
X-TMASE-Result: 10--4.172700-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: lORh06tOiKjxIbpQ8BhdbPHkpkyUphL9Fpw9gj8mywo52X8YwVUEWxqi pukRkz4u+mTbVsoklFeUQ8nzPXHtTuDBvYycsJwVngIgpj8eDcCcIZLVZAQa0BKSkUyWikw9FBp uM64i9KELbigRnpKlKZx+7GyJjhAUaSj54VAn/5vnTTdgJYYhO5neZpYxgHMsYh+/8OhfEZmP3P jSR0yw/2OkFJC+fvEeBsDbsTIQB53IdOzc+bscEwXurkMBOOtl5D9smqVBD9yilnnVDECPd/H7A vsTxZMb7DafdH0+BI6wFMlIPaIBbQ==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/7eDgGoAR9A2HTVYY9ATz9ZXcMl0>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip-03
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 21:35:16 -0000

Hi Martin,

Good to hear from you.

> I have only one request: From a Transport Area perspective,
> it would be good to emphasize RFC 7510 and its details about
> MPLS over UDP.

Happy to accommodate this request.

But what do you have in mind?

There are references to 7510, in the Introduction and in the first two use cases in Section 2.
Then, the packet forwarding procedures in Section 3.2 begin with a reference to 7510 as well.
And there a couple more references in the document.

Thanks,
Adrian