Return-Path: X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B61131065; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 13:35:15 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kfITMclLoLBY; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 13:35:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BDB3130DEF; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 13:35:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x25LZAeU006377; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 21:35:10 GMT Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000B722044; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 21:35:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDD6E22042; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 21:35:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([87.112.237.8]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x25LZ8dw022149 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Mar 2019 21:35:09 GMT Reply-To: From: "Adrian Farrel" To: "'Datatracker on behalf of Martin Stiemerling'" , Cc: , , References: <155182102765.27824.6348634481043936612@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <155182102765.27824.6348634481043936612@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 21:35:08 -0000 Organization: Old Dog Consulting Message-ID: <020a01d4d39b$4e92c460$ebb84d20$@olddog.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQH2Qj+Sv2A2/J/rvZAZjZIPktu+aaW6r8DA Content-Language: en-gb X-Originating-IP: 87.112.237.8 X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-24472.002 X-TM-AS-Result: No--4.173-10.0-31-10 X-imss-scan-details: No--4.173-10.0-31-10 X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-24472.002 X-TMASE-Result: 10--4.172700-10.000000 X-TMASE-MatchedRID: lORh06tOiKjxIbpQ8BhdbPHkpkyUphL9Fpw9gj8mywo52X8YwVUEWxqi pukRkz4u+mTbVsoklFeUQ8nzPXHtTuDBvYycsJwVngIgpj8eDcCcIZLVZAQa0BKSkUyWikw9FBp uM64i9KELbigRnpKlKZx+7GyJjhAUaSj54VAn/5vnTTdgJYYhO5neZpYxgHMsYh+/8OhfEZmP3P jSR0yw/2OkFJC+fvEeBsDbsTIQB53IdOzc+bscEwXurkMBOOtl5D9smqVBD9yilnnVDECPd/H7A vsTxZMb7DafdH0+BI6wFMlIPaIBbQ== X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [mpls] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip-03 X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 21:35:16 -0000 Hi Martin, Good to hear from you. > I have only one request: From a Transport Area perspective, > it would be good to emphasize RFC 7510 and its details about > MPLS over UDP. Happy to accommodate this request. But what do you have in mind? There are references to 7510, in the Introduction and in the first two = use cases in Section 2. Then, the packet forwarding procedures in Section 3.2 begin with a = reference to 7510 as well. And there a couple more references in the document. Thanks, Adrian