IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] comments on draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-encapsulation-01

John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net> Wed, 05 December 2018 19:47 UTC

Return-Path: <jdrake@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D89130EF7 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 11:47:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.171
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.171 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h4niGPFZmq3Y for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 11:47:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com [208.84.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD035130E4C for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 11:47:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108158.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id wB5JiULo011815; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 11:47:06 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=zlN2EHvF1YIC5bF/QeafMUsdk2z3Mf4ulNUjV7jMnLg=; b=b73Ri+QbisK3XBTem3v4bS5MI0xtzcQAqjo/DvV3Y0WJu55VrLjsnUQzNEK4ovHyvhnm jbGGAZOab4VzgqJ6NEcdMbHXz5C1iKpNkLjjLRGgaO4A1I8kDL8eGkUYbTO3Ie+vUfC3 VNNu3iAP4kaFw45oY/y/1LRe0WtddB3u59w/t25VugN8hXFOXzl4GeQdUPwHrKe1U5RA s2l5WdP/GPZDIzoHFhzxRiTwd9/rpsvFbCo1DG1K+UGoz23uWahdinHH27Siq1abtQd0 Vjv5eJkH0B7XUJE+za9aiyHacvAK5s/i+1lGnJhK/0MGfxBtdk4zD1KPuYbzEvBykzs8 lw==
Received: from nam05-dm3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm3nam05lp2058.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.49.58]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2p6kmjr61b-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 05 Dec 2018 11:47:06 -0800
Received: from BN7PR05MB4354.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.133.223.33) by BN7PR05MB5940.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (20.176.31.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1425.8; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 19:47:04 +0000
Received: from BN7PR05MB4354.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2415:1355:f5f1:7a63]) by BN7PR05MB4354.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2415:1355:f5f1:7a63%3]) with mapi id 15.20.1404.016; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 19:47:03 +0000
From: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>
To: Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] comments on draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-encapsulation-01
Thread-Index: AQHUjMxTBYgOHgMPF0erfOraVep5yqVwg9cAgAACswCAAAS1gA==
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 19:47:03 +0000
Message-ID: <BN7PR05MB43549BA39FABBA890341BF0DC7A80@BN7PR05MB4354.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAA=duU3jt+cf3beJmwfAZQVWDGvCV1wmkQpUjxUqrzKkJVW_og@mail.gmail.com> <b6cc364b-6b03-d222-7320-ecabc1735ef5@pi.nu> <CA+-tSzyt8FG1JDOG0tkfySej3nwxA98T2=v+5LUUL0ZaAaD1AA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA=duU1wvhj8xbOctsTyTStJnSx695VOT8jOHPvmsCDm8H6_MQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+-tSzyY8avK7iWP-5fSV1wn+TrMBWxxS7-vNwfCOrvGzMPDQA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+-tSzyY8avK7iWP-5fSV1wn+TrMBWxxS7-vNwfCOrvGzMPDQA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.0.600.7
dlp-reaction: no-action
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.13]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN7PR05MB5940; 6:wt6sQg4KNNwR34hce2Er7XWJrwhmt5SEA07n31flyZqKxioGTnADIU4r6p064ppeEdQGLnhYvO+KGxw8GF0oQgvE8xW2FI6Tf1kxnBNLvXzwPfaVem8lIUwrzTxQ/fFSO06D+3OKVb0QqtUGEg/CpM4p/YnnuAjk2KAQMCKkCByEQIabVQN5N+dvB2dBOUtKx5+u0aFsKvSHDJfasIAth7czbMekwopGxxJjwW0HJUvzRniLnVIEOvFQzuDffOyOz094HSQIWullJGjwPVt5Z/o6COvK/8LjyApg4gG+xjWy9Yk9kIihCvmB3E7e4L9Kc4HrnUHKLceHN0NHGzO4fFPCs6MfbJYoPAXaC0e5s49CWEQe2Ihr4ul/dXkGWwbsA3KNhi/sMr5ac+GNuzP7xbH7CnVArfv23uVameSoBW+WkjMiNtdu4mfxz0nWG30XYs59a8D5cCBjxFHMiE8Q+A==; 5:EQUCVTId0cHV7LJWKdm3sBal1SZI8ZCKpIlzL/P/Kse5RU9krcrE+HPFRsNgGqQYLZp9h/iRWZWuQVaikEfzFE0WwnxoL419R+qQ64MNIQ/m0NW4tTxz43QyJj03I1ZVz9fkUaC6OKuCIZfzlCckv9ZblovB44jfpZPm1qqLKIA=; 7:EEEHu3jkm3iqNCtAfutHnukjtofQ988REDfkwymjebGF9fvCeMCvmBQ/SRM5R70KQZEWKcWWeUQOjQohJL5yXhvMzW87duDLT7ldtddl0i7YOwxfqfpoRhprgRb2jgnKDP8bSbgGd5gpI9VhkLTk8A==
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: e7696906-e4a5-4e59-566a-08d65aea6e58
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390098)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600074)(711020)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:BN7PR05MB5940;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN7PR05MB5940:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN7PR05MB5940662F313C2509CE532489C7A80@BN7PR05MB5940.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(8211001083)(6040522)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3231455)(999002)(944501520)(52105112)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(6055026)(148016)(149066)(150057)(6041310)(20161123562045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123560045)(20161123558120)(20161123564045)(201708071742011)(7699051)(76991095); SRVR:BN7PR05MB5940; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN7PR05MB5940;
x-forefront-prvs: 08770259B4
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(136003)(376002)(346002)(39860400002)(396003)(366004)(199004)(189003)(71190400001)(2171002)(2501003)(790700001)(3846002)(606006)(6246003)(33656002)(6116002)(68736007)(966005)(8676002)(81156014)(81166006)(14454004)(8936002)(86362001)(9326002)(66066001)(11346002)(71200400001)(446003)(26005)(25786009)(256004)(486006)(478600001)(476003)(76176011)(53546011)(6506007)(53936002)(54896002)(9686003)(106356001)(97736004)(102836004)(55016002)(6306002)(99286004)(6436002)(74316002)(105586002)(7696005)(229853002)(7736002)(316002)(2906002)(5660300001)(93886005)(236005)(110136005)(186003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN7PR05MB5940; H:BN7PR05MB4354.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: H3MvN2KGxM8aOEG/QCuEnHUePx09XVvTrxJhu2xtzEMAXDHKdF3ahz2h4vORabEi1UIa9tR9lJzFLLJmJ1l5+AsVhXbYHGcQDJnfmEcUQBFnLdWjzxSQ04GUN0J9vG+QrgZGaSNZ0+irDNLi6weIpn9TXAWzk9gQmfPqfhSGZDzWtqAcpWR+lX719yYTg8G+L6fkUSaJqdAr1yXBssmg2gkQgex1EIf+hPViEQgvc19iPFaxyP/YSFceLfNrzDmLTnSh4bNSMwZQ0vCk/OvokX8lqCYNkq2DzMdHd7Z04E+xcjQMsXONgnzR97cyFTlXOhA+l7PkHJ1FFtZV3qBH5tpDS+9JIPXN9zbkeEKOepE=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BN7PR05MB43549BA39FABBA890341BF0DC7A80BN7PR05MB4354namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: e7696906-e4a5-4e59-566a-08d65aea6e58
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Dec 2018 19:47:03.8263 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN7PR05MB5940
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-12-05_08:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1812050173
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/t1WqCeac6s2-zjG7Qg3asH63038>
Subject: Re: [mpls] comments on draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-encapsulation-01
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 19:47:15 -0000

Hi,

Comment inline

Yours Irrespectively,

John

From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Anoop Ghanwani
Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2018 2:24 PM
To: mpls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] comments on draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-encapsulation-01

Hi Andy,

Yes, I agree my comment wasn't complete.  Perhaps this is better:
"using MPLS as a replacement for NSH (with some loss of functionality) is described elsewhere [x]."

[JD]  Using the MPLS label stack rather than the NSH to carry the Service Path Identifier (SPI) and Service Identifier (SI) is described in …

Also for the second comment, this may be better.


"as a part of normal processing, the SFF Label becomes

the top label in the stack."

Thanks,
Anoop
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 11:14 AM Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com<mailto:agmalis@gmail.com>> wrote:
Anoop,

Thanks, I'll discuss these suggestions with my co-authors. Also, now that we've requested WG LC, Loa may want to treat this as a last call comment.

Your first comment isn't quite correct, since draft-ietf-mpls-sfc only replaces some of the functions of the NSH. For example, there's no packet-by-packet metadata.

Cheers,
Andy


On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 1:57 PM Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu<mailto:anoop@alumni.duke.edu>> wrote:
I think it would be useful for this document to reference
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-sfc<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dietf-2Dmpls-2Dsfc&d=DwMFaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=CRB2tJiQePk0cT-h5LGhEWH-s_xXXup3HzvBSMRj5VE&m=GF5N7QRjSUOtBmx2p0R4gvpBoU5Wyz5nwfbCtE_IUgI&s=db-AmKlTRZlCB0iVIkqVVs9ndN2e-Oo08TNef43l9O8&e=>
in the introduction to say that "using MPLS to replace the function of NSH is described elsewhere [x]".

I think the following:
>>>

the SFF Label will rise to the top of the label stack before

the packet is forwarded to another node and before the packet

is dispatched to a higher layer.
>>>
would be better worded as:


"as a part of normal processing, the SFF Label will become

the top label in the stack before the packet is forwarded

to another node and before the packet is dispatched to a higher layer."

Thanks,
Anoop
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_mpls&d=DwMFaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=CRB2tJiQePk0cT-h5LGhEWH-s_xXXup3HzvBSMRj5VE&m=GF5N7QRjSUOtBmx2p0R4gvpBoU5Wyz5nwfbCtE_IUgI&s=SjAIyvNitzG1Hl4Yhw8do0D7ABHmIC0VBmEBSNKSINU&e=>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email