IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Updated rev -08 posted [Re: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)]

tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Wed, 04 March 2020 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41623A1306; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 09:25:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lLqwKzt3mPPR; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 09:25:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR05-VI1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-vi1eur05on2133.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.21.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5A2F3A1302; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 09:25:47 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=TJ/KYxpzWJ/FBhcQLRCgXRzQ8Nuk5bDMz+3KkCbewKOA4mUYSkOxGYVLvQKUI3SxSuWkLHxt0E4cuGLmMLg1RBnv4LBbO76ydeE/qJrVEpbPIEYtdsd7TaEYyi8N5JxTafeAKz40saK+i+2afUb8nFjGf7VXT9pzdtLZdNKkIyFNLyRs1+cr+pHGdRFrWl/KK0ydJVnkqufogrIGRGMFA+JQ3IAgs0Pa54rzC+E3rEu/S3PFe9tt6aUDii/pHorvy2X6y0IEGge7qn+fgfe60mSomkaChGuhJH3EkcwOsCDi15Eeff5fBNsae/LMCvykfmg/UAPH0UPPdLmS6e0L9A==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;bh=OOkm+3pbPe14kpe6bmvQSDEULjPGEioI8bx68nalJkw=; b=KYXMpOalWSHxD+sc3hMUC3vA2UmkOPhaFNlLr7sDGhfXALYLT+3lHtvQsAhLdKZdywPpVIZzL0tmzjFf+TtLf7t16CEAAo4PhWv8ICCzph2zJwffsphQkhNm803eWw5N9sUTchtPE6riAO+/EsoW9vnwsnUUY7/YlTYh7ZY0x0t/+0qSQGHq3yxu8gfQ9XYGM3Q3xZu83mJctPkmdXwC113fH0ShTfmnCKY/4dAm1D2yY05EEqCBQXGPNM9QXyNQUFbay5ViyMpHT530u7fqyu3EO4WBi6hYi/UY1eEyLAK4DtzV1I9A/sK5PzxwQyEU2fuEfqhzznP9zQCkQhwaMw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=btconnect.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=btconnect.com; dkim=pass header.d=btconnect.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-btconnect-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;bh=OOkm+3pbPe14kpe6bmvQSDEULjPGEioI8bx68nalJkw=; b=v4VKOQLYcYA8onSo0uaWVyWt9EbXpue9lAuusRm6gXsh29eZzYRCMVwPUZryQ7I5Sy2hupmS2PbNH+qR8yHrJw8F4aZCIl3s5OLW13/XNeYgdPVGeBw3iYbKkV4RlhGks+QMT/WzQisiq2G5hFV8K5e12CSBS8YxZojgv6IpJU4=
Received: from DB7PR07MB5657.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (20.178.85.222) by DB7PR07MB5130.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (20.178.40.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2793.9; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 17:25:45 +0000
Received: from DB7PR07MB5657.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a438:bbc9:2ffe:33ee]) by DB7PR07MB5657.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a438:bbc9:2ffe:33ee%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2793.011; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 17:25:45 +0000
From: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: "Kamran Raza (skraza)" <skraza=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Updated rev -08 posted [Re: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)]
Thread-Index: AQHV7e+KMhpzdI5At0eY8iQt426Qmag4txWl
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 17:25:45 +0000
Message-ID: <DB7PR07MB565736B9BADF219EBCD02E59A0E50@DB7PR07MB5657.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <9400B475-128E-484A-BB1E-8CAB6743A894@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <9400B475-128E-484A-BB1E-8CAB6743A894@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ietfc@btconnect.com;
x-originating-ip: [81.131.229.19]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 6623670c-abcf-4fb8-7352-08d7c061128d
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB7PR07MB5130:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB7PR07MB5130A3A37512FC1FB277BEA0A0E50@DB7PR07MB5130.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:4714;
x-forefront-prvs: 0332AACBC3
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(39860400002)(366004)(136003)(376002)(346002)(396003)(199004)(189003)(55016002)(478600001)(966005)(33656002)(2906002)(15650500001)(86362001)(9686003)(186003)(8936002)(71200400001)(26005)(81156014)(110136005)(8676002)(52536014)(4326008)(54906003)(316002)(81166006)(76116006)(66946007)(6506007)(5660300002)(66446008)(7696005)(64756008)(66556008)(66476007)(91956017); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB7PR07MB5130; H:DB7PR07MB5657.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:0; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: btconnect.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 6Em1e6jk7udHEX71T/L+U5YVlTHiEZYw8PVMvNxb2lwzV95tlHqPiFGt+eW1FHhikvOGa+uw6XZcdwx9ooPqC/+NWia7ZnTWgRT95H5wgIrOcG34IFR5FzcCZkKJWmsdCgc+jRGrskp+F+zFU3xDLw==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 6623670c-abcf-4fb8-7352-08d7c061128d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 Mar 2020 17:25:45.0376 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: rccGJ3+BMLL9HQZCab3yqdSyJ0nggTYu9+pXVqo1nf531So/yG3bxBCm0wmT4QxkiaL3zLpg2ikZQGLahzH7ew==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB7PR07MB5130
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/m__S-oGvo50c67y1Ui58HB4lKs8>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Updated rev -08 posted [Re: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)]
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 17:25:50 -0000

____________________________________
From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Kamran Raza (skraza) <skraza=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Sent: 28 February 2020 04:28


Nothing to do with Roman's comments but

RFC7277 is referenced in the YANG module but is absent from the I-D References

Tom Petch




Thanks for your review Roman.
We have posted a new rev -08 that takes care your comments and comments from other IESG reviewers.
On behalf of authors, Please see inline [skraza]:

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    DISCUSS:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Thank you for using the YANG Security Considerations template.  Could you
    please provide more details on which nodes are sensitive to write and read
    issues; and the RPC operations of concern.  For example, see
    draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg or draft-ietf-ospf-yang.

[skraza]: Done. Please see significantly enhanced section in the posted rev -08.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    A few trivial editorial nits:
[skraza]: Have fixed all those.


    * Section 1.1. Typo.  s/minumum/minimum/
    * Section 1.1.  Typo. s/catogories/categories/
    * Section 1.1.  Typo. s/higlighting/highlighting/
    * Section 3.0.  Typo. s/grapically/graphically/
    * Section 5.2.1.  Typo. s/an network-instance/a network-instance/


    _______________________________________________
    mpls mailing list
    mpls@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls


_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

v2.34.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status