IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document

Rolf Winter <Rolf.Winter@neclab.eu> Mon, 07 March 2016 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <Rolf.Winter@neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3911B1B4370 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 08:08:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.603
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.603 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VcTkZdBzw19Z for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 08:08:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu (mailer1.neclab.eu [195.37.70.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B863D1B4351 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 08:08:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3553E10C64B for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 17:08:33 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (netlab.nec.de)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas-a.office.hd [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1CKCm1_v8h_F for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 17:08:33 +0100 (CET)
X-ENC: Last-Hop-TLS-encrypted
X-ENC: Last-Hop-TLS-encrypted
Received: from ENCELADUS.office.hd (enceladus.office.hd [192.168.24.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BBE210C646 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 17:08:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from PALLENE.office.hd ([169.254.1.191]) by ENCELADUS.office.hd ([192.168.24.52]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 17:08:10 +0100
From: Rolf Winter <Rolf.Winter@neclab.eu>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document
Thread-Index: AQHRdrqMPN0Oc0PhskueKLu11AnMCJ9OKV0w
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 16:08:09 +0000
Message-ID: <791AD3077F94194BB2BDD13565B6295DA9D349E7@PALLENE.office.hd>
References: <56DA9B26.8050800@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <56DA9B26.8050800@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US, de-DE
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.7.0.203]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/8LWUXnIWbYuX7fpvLEYNIlP7x_w>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 16:08:37 -0000

Support

NEC Europe Ltd | Registered Office: Athene, Odyssey Business Park, West End  Road, London, HA4 6QE, GB | Registered in England 2832014


> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson
> Sent: Samstag, 5. März 2016 09:39
> To: mpls@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@ietf.org
> Subject: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-
> mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document
> 
> Working Group,
> 
> This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-
> updates as an MPLS working group document.
> 
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org) Please give a technical motivation
> for your support/not support, especially if you think that the document
> should not be adopted as a working group document.
> 
> There are no IPR disclosures against this document.
> 
> All the authors has stated on the on the mpls wg mailing list that they
> are not aware of any IPRs that relate to this document.
> 
> Note: One of the issues that surfaced in the MPLS-RT review was that
> the implementation status was unclear. To check on this we did an early
> implementation poll. There have been responses to the mailing, to the
> mpls wg chairs and to my uni-directionally. The conclusion is that RFC
> 7271 (the specification that this document updates) is well implemented
> and we know of deployments; a rather large number of vendors says that
> they will implement this draft and operators has stated that it will be
> deployed once it is available.
> 
> The working group adoption poll ends March 19, 2016.
> 
> /Loa
> 
> MPLS wg co-chair.
> --
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status