IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Re: John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

xiao.min2@zte.com.cn Tue, 10 September 2024 06:37 UTC

Return-Path: <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3B8C14F6AA; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 23:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l-ppy7iWRhCx; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 23:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AF4EC151069; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 23:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4X2vBy0Qf5z5B1CP; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:37:30 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njb2app07.zte.com.cn ([10.55.22.95]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 48A6bJSE053276; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:37:19 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from xiao.min2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njy2app01[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:37:20 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:37:20 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2af966dfe920fffffffff3c-f35ac
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202409101437205152g3Mg6rXkxl2HdIohx8JX@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <63C1F4CE-3437-4A53-8196-93C00E5FBE6F@tony.li>
References: 20240909084747863DD6L3jyLtJvvqYF9jzk2r@zte.com.cn,20240910141950285thZInxELPhbnFSBkdgXlH@zte.com.cn,63C1F4CE-3437-4A53-8196-93C00E5FBE6F@tony.li
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
To: tony.li@tony.li
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 48A6bJSE053276
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 66DFE92A.000/4X2vBy0Qf5z5B1CP
Message-ID-Hash: YDJZ7SOH5O3IJGLT6MQLLVKMSFUSBJ2X
X-Message-ID-Hash: YDJZ7SOH5O3IJGLT6MQLLVKMSFUSBJ2X
X-MailFrom: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: iesg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation@ietf.org, mpls-chairs@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org, tsaad@cisco.com
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [mpls] Re: John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/8_jC_P8Y1_i2xPww_rH1weUXs-s>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Tony,

I'm ok with the text you provided. How about others?
Cheers,
Xiao Min

Original


From: TonyLi <tony.li@tony.li>
To: 肖敏10093570;
Cc: James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>;Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>;The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>;draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation <draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation@ietf.org>;mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>;mpls <mpls@ietf.org>;tsaad@cisco.com <tsaad@cisco.com>;
Date: 2024年09月10日 14:31
Subject: Re: [mpls] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Xiao Min,
I did not understand the proposal was to remove the text about moving to Historic status.  Thus, I was expecting something more like:

>> Note that in parallel to the work of this document, there is ongoing work on MPLS Network Actions (MNA) [RFC9613]. The MPLS performance measurement with the Alternate-Marking method can also be achieved by MNA encapsulation. In addition, MNA will provide a broader use case applicability. That means the MNA encapsulation will provide an alternative, more advanced solution, when published as an RFC and it is agreed that this document will be made Historic at that time.
Regards,
Tony


On Sep 9, 2024, at 11:19 PM, - xiao.min2 at zte.com.cn <mailforwards@cloudmails.net> wrote:


Hi Tony,

Could you please provide the text you expected? Or remain the current text as is?

Cheers,
Xiao Min

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status