Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident

[Stewart Bryant <[e-mail]>]

As a requirements draft, I know of no IPR per se,
but the reader may be drawn to the solutions
posited in the SFL drafts which do have disclosed IPR.

The reference in the text to the need to implement a
solution to

draft-tempia-ippm-p3m-02 
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tempia-ippm-p3m-02>  

by definition brings in it to play the IPR disclosed
against that draft.

- Stewart



On 12/11/2015 16:28, Ross Callon wrote:
>
> Working Group,
>
> The authors of draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident have told us that the
>
> draft is ready to be polled to see if we have consensus to make it a 
> working
>
> group document.
>
> Before we start the adoption poll we will do an IPR poll. This mail 
> starts the IPR poll.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident?
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
>
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> Currently there are no IPR disclosures that relate to this document.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
>
> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
>
> IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The
>
> document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
>
> received from each author and contributor.
>
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
>
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
>
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
> Thanks, Ross
>
> (as MPLS WG co-chair)
>