Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Sun, 22 May 2016 00:37 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF8212D13F; Sat, 21 May 2016 17:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ITw9_FStSkvE; Sat, 21 May 2016 17:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B868E12D5C3; Sat, 21 May 2016 17:37:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2679; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1463877454; x=1465087054; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=VBc2c1eFmACz9TIYZ1fl1u11v3ZclS/BBqNcUWIxWjU=; b=UMti8wpvKgJgkk6hcC90vjHeISSgmekKVXZmWzXYJWdlmNG6EhP3lCz/ iC2Mj+RpNNsxqA0666F2dxe7Rp/w+engb7yOeT3vsMBaMU672R/B6YtxY kuNVzURhKubAhPS94bQVg0XRskpQ8aaTCvFmbQpkLsZ37SlPi6EP/HbYA o=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 841
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BMAwAJ/kBX/4ENJK1cgzdWfQa5eQ6BdRcLhF+BEAKBITgUAQEBAQEBAWUnhEIBAQEDAQEBASBIAwsFCQICAQgYKgICGwwLJQIEDgUOiBkIDrI5kH8BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEOCQUFhiKBdgiCT4QREQGDHSuCEhwFmDcBgyqBaIkNgWmET4hkj0sBHgFDgjiBNW6ICzZ/AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,347,1459814400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="275708635"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 22 May 2016 00:37:33 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-017.cisco.com (xch-rtp-017.cisco.com [64.101.220.157]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u4M0bXJD003083 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 22 May 2016 00:37:33 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) by XCH-RTP-017.cisco.com (64.101.220.157) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Sat, 21 May 2016 20:37:32 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Sat, 21 May 2016 20:37:32 -0400
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
Thread-Index: AQHRsOxZp7gU3f+auUOHwVY7hEGGVp/EZXWA
Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 00:37:32 +0000
Message-ID: <A1691499-E75B-4105-BB92-B4B33C291E3F@cisco.com>
References: <729f6a0b-6222-7100-3b79-2291870d4421@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <729f6a0b-6222-7100-3b79-2291870d4421@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.252.235]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B2A5CD78-2D66-4710-9C61-093BBA95F87E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/9JhbHYY9Xlihd_GG2nyCKPfPVn8>
Cc: "draft-saad-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org" <draft-saad-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-saad-mpls-static-yang@ietf.org" <draft-saad-mpls-static-yang@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 00:37:43 -0000

Loa.

I reviewed this work for the MPLS RT.

I support adoption of these two documents, as they provide useful work and a solid initial basis for it.

Thanks,

— Carlos.

> On May 18, 2016, at 6:01 AM, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:
> 
> 
> Working Group,
> 
> This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-saad-mpls-static-
> yang-03 and draft-saad-mpls-base-yang-00 as MPLS working group
> documents.
> 
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical
> motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
> the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
> 
> There are no IPR disclosures against either document. An IPR poll has
> been started in parallel to this adoption poll
> 
> The working group adoption poll ends June 2, 2016, given that the IPR
> poll has concluded.
> 
> /Loa
> 
> MPLS wg co-chair.
> --
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls