Re: [mpls] Working Group Adoption Poll (WGAP) on draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Thu, 23 December 2021 01:00 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBEDE3A0ECB; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 17:00:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.696
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_COMMENT_SAVED_URL=1.391, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HTML_ATTACH=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LSaHkipAtvG2; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 17:00:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52d.google.com (mail-ed1-x52d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7382C3A0EC6; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 17:00:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id x15so15152386edv.1; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 17:00:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DGVj/TYsAU2T1HjsFUbWl1hyyO8qHRXDPkT3xaPwAhk=; b=fbIoG6BoiHgqAIsyiu1IKpWxcgI0SYX7dy3Ls7krTIkqx5g7OsNn8CtEYymY04QYOo /KrNcNSNy8gT2l/YTwN+Jo5JTQo7CYNn0YeOPtYOIcuJSaxw0l0DAQepx/RWtzm3e9Yk GYKiIb3PRuY+c0lLJJPwV6zbwMTBhMsELshLLiny3RmzS2s3lHyQu+Ja1VIeKjTfGS94 0CTkjx4WUBqZlKG8+tmngYesDgUm2Gwog89VCfTlVLbYbNtfWaGJ2gbE46O5viiN2Bhn CgoMhFaSmhlzBOLR4o9Pb47wVylszhkxgCks5W87aiqZETost1rGmq/qXD2kUbFCX3WM D1ew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DGVj/TYsAU2T1HjsFUbWl1hyyO8qHRXDPkT3xaPwAhk=; b=M5KMk52udD+8ju81CR/B6P8kIq+Y/1MWA6wKExTXUbADIJog44q8MQSgcbCh+UrciC E8yYpk9uGyzKi+kXkYhupfeE6mqe+IqXz7p1n/zpYE5KfrYfP68JELw+oPwNTkWC0Vay glagqWVbE/aqbjX6y3RsgWCc8CURGUqb3Ds4ESDuPTQyGd1/u9bUJQWzfPCMgE/xPVHr 0LrwG/eJ/Vb9NChex6F7MJ8ly+crCQCAyGKyiT1s2pujkpD8oWuifeAU11unGnkjXaq8 +hMRcSjx2BVestbIsfa9Psr0L907zoirjY7bVRIctX+ylEHOpONENAku71XYvXruitbY 7pEQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533RL/CuWA4eR21cs3O0w467nqi7FF6GeW24RaQXK6N4J70vzFQR jMn28qhmmLJxbu/D5RwyhOAADwNavBWyz1ii7gcrlvtF
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzhJ4sHP57zDMkdF06fUeYhOb7+fMdI66ELBHPmwmDC7t3O7bw/8XqBofTXPi3HinVWnh1zd587iCnw3USEO2E=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7305:: with SMTP id di5mr177913ejc.255.1640221216102; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 17:00:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <8cfdc537-27da-240e-be9e-835b0d5fc82d@pi.nu> <93117e385f944efeadf5c1e6eb954e1e@huawei.com> <CA+RyBmWqe8Kz5SEm9R1fRK-Wnc2S-W3JXAzd8VuMfEhEys9E5Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmWqe8Kz5SEm9R1fRK-Wnc2S-W3JXAzd8VuMfEhEys9E5Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 17:00:04 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmXOu2LH0pEnrk1fS5bAAHAMDTMX6wamyyLOYU7DNb8pCA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
Cc: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd@ietf.org" <draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="000000000000f07dfe05d3c5c2a3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/9KS6XVuWm6rQjdjeUIg3F2eyfRU>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Working Group Adoption Poll (WGAP) on draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 01:00:27 -0000

Hi Jie,
following on your suggestion, I've added the figure in the working version.
I greatly appreciate it if you can check the attached diff and let me know
if I've got your idea right.

Regards,
Greg

On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:05 AM Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jie,
> thank you for your kind words and suggestions. Will work on adding the
> figure to the draft. In case of the Non-IP encapsulation of Multipoint BFD,
> the Source Address TLV is considered as part of the message on the message
> on the new Generalized Associated Channel Type (Multipoint BFD Session).
> That message includes BFD Control message and the Source Address TLV. We'll
> display these =lements in the new figure.
>
> Happy Holidays to All!
>
> Kind regards,
> Greg
>
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 7:14 PM Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Loa,
>>
>> I've read this document and support its adoption.
>>
>> I have one comment which could be resolved either before or after the
>> adoption.
>>
>> Section 3.2 describes the Non-IP Encapsulation of Multipoint BFD, in
>> which a new ACH channel type is defined, and it says a Source Address TLV
>> MUST immediately follow a BFD control message.
>>
>> I'd suggest to provide a figure of the packet format of non-IP Multipoint
>> BFD encapsulation. And one related question is: is the source address TLV
>> considered as part of the Multipoint BFD packet or not?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Jie
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson
>> > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 6:36 AM
>> > To: mpls@ietf.org
>> > Cc: draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@ietf.org
>> > Subject: [mpls] Working Group Adoption Poll (WGAP) on
>> > draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd
>> >
>> > Working Group,
>> >
>> > This is to start a two week poll on adopting
>> >   draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd
>> > as a MPLS working group document.
>> >
>> > Though "two weeks" brings all the way into the holiday season. so it
>> will be a
>> > bit longer.
>> >
>> > Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
>> > group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical motivation
>> for your
>> > support/not support, especially if you think that the document should
>> not be
>> > adopted as a working group document.
>> >
>> > There is no IPRs disclosure against this document.
>> >
>> > The authors have all stated on the MPLS wg mailing list that they are
>> > unaware of any IPRs that relates to this document.
>> >
>> > The working group adoption poll ends January 4, 2022.
>> >
>> > /Loa
>> > --
>> > Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
>> > Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
>> > Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > mpls mailing list
>> > mpls@ietf.org
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>>
>