Re: [mpls] Working Group Adoption Poll (WGAP) on draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd

[Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]>]

Hi Jie,
following on your suggestion, I've added the figure in the working version.
I greatly appreciate it if you can check the attached diff and let me know
if I've got your idea right.

Regards,
Greg

On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:05 AM Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi Jie,
> thank you for your kind words and suggestions. Will work on adding the
> figure to the draft. In case of the Non-IP encapsulation of Multipoint BFD,
> the Source Address TLV is considered as part of the message on the message
> on the new Generalized Associated Channel Type (Multipoint BFD Session).
> That message includes BFD Control message and the Source Address TLV. We'll
> display these =lements in the new figure.
>
> Happy Holidays to All!
>
> Kind regards,
> Greg
>
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 7:14 PM Dongjie (Jimmy) <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Loa,
>>
>> I've read this document and support its adoption.
>>
>> I have one comment which could be resolved either before or after the
>> adoption.
>>
>> Section 3.2 describes the Non-IP Encapsulation of Multipoint BFD, in
>> which a new ACH channel type is defined, and it says a Source Address TLV
>> MUST immediately follow a BFD control message.
>>
>> I'd suggest to provide a figure of the packet format of non-IP Multipoint
>> BFD encapsulation. And one related question is: is the source address TLV
>> considered as part of the Multipoint BFD packet or not?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Jie
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: mpls [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson
>> > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 6:36 AM
>> > To: [e-mail]
>> > Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
>> > Subject: [mpls] Working Group Adoption Poll (WGAP) on
>> > draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd
>> >
>> > Working Group,
>> >
>> > This is to start a two week poll on adopting
>> >   draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd
>> > as a MPLS working group document.
>> >
>> > Though "two weeks" brings all the way into the holiday season. so it
>> will be a
>> > bit longer.
>> >
>> > Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
>> > group mailing list ([e-mail]) Please give a technical motivation
>> for your
>> > support/not support, especially if you think that the document should
>> not be
>> > adopted as a working group document.
>> >
>> > There is no IPRs disclosure against this document.
>> >
>> > The authors have all stated on the MPLS wg mailing list that they are
>> > unaware of any IPRs that relates to this document.
>> >
>> > The working group adoption poll ends January 4, 2022.
>> >
>> > /Loa
>> > --
>> > Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
>> > Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
>> > Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: [phone]
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > mpls mailing list
>> > [e-mail]
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>>
>