IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Wed, 05 June 2024 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C5FFC14F5EC; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 08:50:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.746
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.746 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v5gRjjIBZ0mu; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 08:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x634.google.com (mail-pl1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::634]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72731C14F5E3; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 08:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x634.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1f47f07aceaso104525ad.0; Wed, 05 Jun 2024 08:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1717602626; x=1718207426; darn=ietf.org; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dkwnsekwVfDHpuUEx0H0n+v0MF7xNNvONiIjK4aL6Ys=; b=HqnemrUc30LQYe13ahI16fdp97q4x4aKasiE2r+L3EoNyBcgkf8Wiz4dp+Em6YPJEg JmvTdLMWPRBdlRHNiGfeFX1e3LMFy9D4rjFFqrzSU/PJRw1wnjPVkX1pfDlzqURlhQMY JX2UwGltwM0Y8iPan6TZirNLbdbvtiqAXtLWngacPFo3UxtK75HlesQnSlTzfosodNHb OQI+eFcDpYHYOMRjtb0ipCLS71HFotq4ETnQk3oQ2Mt4e4A9MefwRXMIxGQ/FjCAMN2v 8Bxnhg/+3k4wikV1Nb48GbJkbKaPJmFBlhkdEkznqAqVXMfrpuplSG+Tkvoa6M7Rb2YA 9DlQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1717602626; x=1718207426; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=dkwnsekwVfDHpuUEx0H0n+v0MF7xNNvONiIjK4aL6Ys=; b=VDfe3P59Pni5ZkffgH3LNc3ayMeo0rxfHQn0rHT3Df9p9Takzrj4oiFIU+/xnDA3Ll d733WtYodpqLbT5uvIETC4bnbmhQr6zD0lvecoh3le91mv7LalVfNWij6uI5pTfU2rIU hi3JHwNG63EdPtxebjIdOoPl2PDouaNTMsUJBMeg7ogGrUWGsGNtnubX5pjkWhIvvUZl hkzrt7pNQ5szGUxPD4s0kOFM2VrtXdiR6t58rXj7thg0l+c/vx/URJhoBd/shYPfNjEY aGgWy8aLwhMM4KvAmVQFpAczyda3t92hm6tLTi62u8EkeF8vedCIIGEXk84D/Jx0v/i4 JGxw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUIh0U5DdJzCAViNex2VQ1J9ZBEBtAr5vJh3HDm1yV+CKVQWj91a4lGdzPAxxNLaYiuZ25o08FLoZXca8huG764DoY9YLAJXsRJDXkTKG2VZWS9f9qmdFzGSZLHmqSvxMfx8dWjxybFUc2FWB6nb/5hTih+oTo=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyrMPpGWWDxyoOgoX+qjB0SmKoYT1jiAurihCgcryYhOdLc4Pns bZ0bGQBe+Dc1VJpmt32bX8SkGmdk1xbqTfOJgdlFKH4Mcv1mkgb9cveKQQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGAK0IA3Uvmcbd/0qWE2xToyQNdCmCTVv9KM36Mh1Odbu4rLg8n4iTjc/EEhbop3H2ge+bb/A==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1c9:b0:1f4:5fe5:74d1 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1f6a5a0deb8mr36286175ad.18.1717602620544; Wed, 05 Jun 2024 08:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-73-93-167-4.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.93.167.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-1f632338be8sm103610995ad.44.2024.06.05.08.50.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Jun 2024 08:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Message-Id: <E6280CE1-0F95-4315-AE04-B54FE6551C43@tony.li>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C1D18905-2093-445A-AD88-38B3FAE8C060"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.600.62\))
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2024 08:50:09 -0700
In-Reply-To: <B2A706BE-A232-4F32-B1F1-9BB328CAD8B9@gmail.com>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
References: <DS0PR19MB65014515D511B396E79BA36FFCF82@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <B2A706BE-A232-4F32-B1F1-9BB328CAD8B9@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.600.62)
Message-ID-Hash: ELMFAO6C7S66OOAZMF7WXUR6UBK7SMQT
X-Message-ID-Hash: ELMFAO6C7S66OOAZMF7WXUR6UBK7SMQT
X-MailFrom: tony1athome@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [mpls] Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/9lW2BIWlNZisK6irqBD3SL6obhE>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

[WG chair hat: off]

Hi Stewart,

Unfortunately, there are IPR claims on the technology. However, in this case, I disagree and think that we should proceed with this solution.
For reasons that I’m not supposed to discuss, I believe that this is entirely consistent.

Regards,
Tony


> On Jun 5, 2024, at 8:30 AM, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Without prejudice to the technology itself which I will review shortly.
> 
> The WG rejected another technology because it was encumbered with IPR. 
> 
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/tMJybst_lhIx43M3_ic9e9x3_fI/
> 
> For example Tony Li, now an MPLS WG Chair, says:
> 
> "I do NOT support adopting this as a working group document.
> 
> "I find that the terms of the IPR disclosure are overly restrictive and would prefer that we selected a different technology for this problem.”
> 
> As far as I can see from the IPR disclosures, this technology is encumbered with similar IPR terms and is thus also overly restricted.
> 
> For consistency It would appear that we should also reject draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr on the grounds of restricted IPR.
> 
> I therefore propose that draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr is rejected as a solution.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Stewart
> 
> 
> 
>> On 4 Jun 2024, at 03:50, Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear WG,
>> This email starts a two-week Working Group last call for draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr/>.
>> Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version, and it is ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits are most welcome.
>> Please send your comments to the mpls WG mailing list (mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>).
>> If necessary, comments may be sent unidirectional to the WG chairs.
>>  
>> Note, currently there are 5 IPR disclosures against this document at https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr
>>  
>> This poll runs until June 18, 2024.
>> Thank you,
>> Tarek (for the MPLS WG co-chairs)
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list -- mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
>> To unsubscribe send an email to mpls-leave@ietf.org <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status