Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-lim-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping

Vanson Lim <vlim@cisco.com> Thu, 09 May 2013 02:16 UTC

Return-Path: <vlim@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE5721F854E for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2013 19:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wy7dBIypOKVc for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2013 19:16:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C6821F8539 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 May 2013 19:16:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2168; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1368065773; x=1369275373; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=guhL2G5BgFqoNA6Jb2mh01qwIeFwXIqb3LPf8nOHE4I=; b=bK9SBqmJyR+Emjhm28AkWfCiAUM/L08chPM10mnHNh5SbFsmNFQwxcfI eWu1SaAa832e9Zw2G+x2PQbYs0RcX58fmsr7ylZRkkgUrD800dPQTXDu4 tmpdoxwpaK93SYVQIi2sL94+MgeUYNasrvR7CeoCR817y5DY1OU8ADB/Z s=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,638,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="208094784"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 May 2013 02:16:13 +0000
Received: from [10.98.73.148] (bxb-vlim-8813.cisco.com [10.98.73.148]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r492GBEr016916; Thu, 9 May 2013 02:16:12 GMT
Message-ID: <518B06EB.3070105@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 22:16:11 -0400
From: Vanson Lim <vlim@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
References: <2FE467D3673DCE409A84D67EC2F607BB0FA6DA09@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <2FE467D3673DCE409A84D67EC2F607BB0FA6DA09@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-lim-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping@tools.ietf.org" <draft-lim-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping@tools.ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-lim-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 02:16:18 -0000

No additional disclosures from me.. George's disclosure is all that I am aware of.

-Vanson


On 5/8/13 12:17 PM, George Swallow (swallow) wrote:
> Loa -
>
> Cisco has IPR as disclosed in
>
> IPR that was submitted by cisco, and
> 			
> 				
> 				    is related to
> 				
> 				
> 				       draft-swallow-mpls-remote-lsp-ping, "Proxy LSP Ping,"
> 				
> 				
> 			
> 			
> 			
> 			
> 			
> 			   2006-12-20
> 			   ID # 778
> 			   "Cisco's Statement about IPR claimed in
> draft-swallow-mpls-remote-lsp-ping-00.txt"
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/778/>
>
>
> This clearly needs to be updated to point at the current document.  I will
> take care of that.
>
> George
>
> On 5/8/13 4:56 AM, "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu> wrote:
>
>> Working Group and authors;
>>
>> The authors of Working Group and authors;
>>
>> The authors of draft-lim-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping has indicated
>> that the draft is ready to be adopted as a working group document.
>>
>> Before we start that poll we need to do an IPR poll on the draft, this
>> mail starts that IPR poll.
>>
>> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-lim-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping?
>>
>> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
>> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>>
>> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
>> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
>> IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The
>> documents will not advance to the next stage until a response
>> has been received from each author and contributor.
>>
>> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
>> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
>> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>>
>>
>> Thanks, Loa
>> (as MPLS WG co-chair)
>>
>> -- 
>>
>>
>> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
>> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
>> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64
> .
>