Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution
xiao.min2@zte.com.cn Tue, 13 September 2022 02:40 UTC
Return-Path: <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419B7C1526F3 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 19:40:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.998, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vBqGzVbuxsWG for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 19:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A046C1526F0 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 19:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4MRSNw34nSz8QrkZ; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 10:40:00 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp03.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.202]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 28D2deZM032239; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 10:39:40 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from xiao.min2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp01[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 10:39:40 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 10:39:40 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2af9631fed6cffffffffd4de59f2
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202209131039408707655@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <BL3PR11MB5731A884F6E9325BD265AE0BBF449@BL3PR11MB5731.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: 7c419233-7cba-1bb0-740d-34e09f149efe@pi.nu, DS0PR19MB650143C4F4C1B9BF3E60C888FC7A9@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com, bc67ab72-e36c-cd5f-27aa-0441c4ee093c@pi.nu, DS0PR19MB65019CECC654037542FC2588FC7E9@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com, VI1PR0701MB6991B4A8EEEB56202E4D377AEB439@VI1PR0701MB6991.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com, CAPOsKjFMbqbwMt5ETzTr_zbdk7r8ApkMsHwdo0UiQFFey++=Ww@mail.gmail.com, BL3PR11MB57310626CD47E373E9FD745BBF449@BL3PR11MB5731.namprd11.prod.outlook.com, 0459ad6f-958c-4cd3-2668-a0a88bf1d11d@joelhalpern.com, BL3PR11MB5731155791027C8154EB4B2CBF449@BL3PR11MB5731.namprd11.prod.outlook.com, 3a6fb958-42f8-7293-ce7b-2cecf59ed3ca@joelhalpern.com, BL3PR11MB5731A884F6E9325BD265AE0BBF449@BL3PR11MB5731.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
To: rgandhi=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org
Cc: jmh@joelhalpern.com, tsaad.net@gmail.com, mpls@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 28D2deZM032239
X-Fangmail-Gw-Spam-Type: 0
X-FangMail-Miltered: at cgslv5.04-192.168.250.137.novalocal with ID 631FED80.000 by FangMail milter!
X-FangMail-Envelope: 1663036800/4MRSNw34nSz8QrkZ/631FED80.000/10.5.228.81/[10.5.228.81]/mse-fl1.zte.com.cn/<xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 631FED80.000/4MRSNw34nSz8QrkZ
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/AYN0Mkv_gyJUMwVpBjgxo1xFH8I>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 02:40:07 -0000
Hi all, As a co-author, I support progressing draft-jags-mpls-mna-hdr as the basis of the pursued one solution. Best Regards, Xiao Min ------------------Original------------------ From: RakeshGandhi(rgandhi) <rgandhi=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> To: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>;Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>; Cc: mpls@ietf.org <mpls@ietf.org>; Date: 2022年09月13日 06:34 Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls Hi Joel, Yes, one solution. And we support progressing the draft-jags-mpls-mna-hdr as that solution. Thanks, Rakesh From: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Date: Monday, September 12, 2022 at 5:53 PM To: Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) <rgandhi@cisco.com>, Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com> Cc: mpls@ietf.org <mpls@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Then we agree that we want only one solution. I read the poll as being agnostic on the question of what the one solution would look like. Given that there are at least two solutions that seem to work (and are now quite similar) on the table, I would expect a fairly typical process for getting to one good solution. Yours, Joel On 9/12/2022 5:50 PM, Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) wrote: Hi Joel, Thanks for your comments. Please see inline with <RG>. From: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Date: Monday, September 12, 2022 at 5:41 PM To: Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) <rgandhi@cisco.com>, Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com> Cc: mpls@ietf.org <mpls@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution The phrasing in this sub-thread of messages seems a bit odd to me. Are you folks really saying you want to see two (or more) different solutions for MNA? That seems highly undesirable. <RG> We are saying - progressing the draft-jags-mpls-mna-hdr as a “single” MNA solution. <RG> Definitely not two or more different solutions for MNA. I read the poll as choosing between one solution and many solutions. You seem to be saying you read the poll as being between crafting something new and having multiple solutions?? <RG> We are saying - progressing one solution only, which is defined in draft-jags-mpls-mna-hdr. Thanks, Rakesh Yours, Joel On 9/12/2022 3:50 PM, Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) wrote: Hi WG Chairs, I support option (B) as progressing the draft-jags-mpls-mna-hdr (that is well-thought of by the co-authors) as a single solution for MNA. I do not support option (A) as new authors from the open DT team to take pieces from the draft and submit a new document. Thanks, Rakesh From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, 6 September 2022 at 19:50 To: mpls@ietf.org <mpls@ietf.org> Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, pals-chairs@ietf.org <pals-chairs@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org> Subject: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Dear MPLS WG and MPLS Open DT, Over the past months, the MPLS Open DT has reviewed several proposals for the packet encodings for the MNA solution. A compilation of the multiple solutions brought forward is present at https://trac.ietf.org/trac/mpls/wiki/MNADocumnets. We believe that currently there are two alternative ways to progress the MNA solution. One of them requires a single unified solution, and the other allows for individual solutions to progress independently. We expect any unified solution to document the pieces from the presented solutions that are discussed and agreed upon in the weekly MPLS Open DT meeting. The co-chairs for the working groups hosting the Open MPLS DT are polling the WG on their preference to move forward. Please respond with either: A) “I support the MPLS Open DT bringing forward a single unified solution" OR B) “I support progressing the individual solution(s) independently" We will allow this poll to run for two weeks (ending on Sept 19th). Regards, Tarek (for the MPLS Open DT co-chairs) _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
- [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Tarek Saad
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Joel Halpern
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Tarek Saad
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution tom petch
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Tarek Saad
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Yingzhen Qu
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution xiao.min2
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Gyan Mishra
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution tom petch
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Jaganbabu Rajamanickam
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Jisu Bhattacharya (jisu)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Joel Halpern
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Joel Halpern
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution xiao.min2
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution xiao.min2
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Jaganbabu Rajamanickam
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Jaganbabu Rajamanickam
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Jisu Bhattacharya (jisu)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution bruno.decraene
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution tom petch
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Zafar Ali (zali)
- [mpls] Poll results (was: Poll on way forward for… Tarek Saad