Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Mon, 13 November 2017 08:26 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D181294E6; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:26:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tkjxGA_g5gRK; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:26:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22c.google.com (mail-pf0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1332D126B6E; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:26:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id t69so2349167pfg.4; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:26:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=398q34b4G9L9BWTN2NSfLcA92vTzNDOMvKTW4fQ60rQ=; b=SjplKAtWPb4ccNIk/gJz8jnOM6rTfTByIxTTOm/mSEGW4ZgqM8tX7BH5LtP26uEKHx 6q4zuFR5aTDyAakMBTt98p8wBsedSKn3g7nYC5BKYQVNdHXk9JoFmiim6WBGPT4OanCH 7QSaIJpGq5n/C+9yPIghviuPT1veple1wcOZ+vEPZWGMmSaXiQjpsTmC+KTcvNfKfyLG sdmLjfUJATAIfa3Dz5yfQ63dY0CwYWEb85HMGiUovz1cb8ehNDJHlIdHNSA+P0U6MJhz pw9YiCoJc/82t4WdcKPEnRJ+c994ebb4Lfobhf6/N0v2WB0xujGS9LPMYo//C6Gk58WM hySg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=398q34b4G9L9BWTN2NSfLcA92vTzNDOMvKTW4fQ60rQ=; b=gxBY4BHRLTaFt5oJ6wLtzktdUvD0mH81+5vsgpHKBIKwu7lMD7Daqm5lx5KYWq9Ets asfXmFFUSYMgUQDXChafe4KzP/EXRb/J/wz28M3BEtBi0AVczma1U4U+uk18hRpN1vm/ WvCK5dsMnhhEf+FyQcK+mrl47ceUdZgsNG3sfGwuTSsBrUe8pzDmQl7Bb2W6xcmz0F98 YkKrtTK4excQzZ1WqkUZ3i06RuXGZMz3cOvsFic3Wl5Eia4h6s8Gi8yKGDVWCaDsGeVw CBpX/esRPN0SgTlEe/ieWqsAHWguqFiM7zmEldcBmvoanM1VJmMVPGdBJalQUj06S/gk B+PQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6GBJPDx54m0XSUHTENFJ5aHNt3fJ4r16BzFDmQWS021in71WQl WPRo4jPKaHa8DviBQ0mBm72mqBZhloLi0mKXT9+xD6+M
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZSsXQmm+KlnvxacyqlaFaIjXnZOdvKy3NXemC+sv/IKqSgn99IpZLnkJAOPm+OSTaY9TVshmMT8JEFf75BgwE=
X-Received: by 10.84.212.136 with SMTP id e8mr8171967pli.205.1510561614571; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:26:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.171.15 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:26:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3a590768494f45208f2c568b80913b91@HE105662.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
References: <3a590768494f45208f2c568b80913b91@HE105662.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 03:26:54 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTsDsn=vp2fYHQW3oCpKL7KLZfK5FoYh+P8Lg8EBx4GH5Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: N.Leymann@telekom.de
Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org, IETF MPLS List <mpls@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045d24f672ac8b055dd908cd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/AYsmFk9TS6e_yAMKJMZNP-Ir3d8>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 08:26:57 -0000

Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft. The IPR has been
disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules.
datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2580

Regards,
-Pavan

On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 5:01 AM, <N.Leymann@telekom.de> wrote:

> Working Group,
>
> We are currently preparing draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr for working group
> last call. We will do an IPR poll prior to the wglc.
>
> This is to start the IPR Poll.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr?
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see
> RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> Please note that there is already one IPR disclosed for the individual
> document:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2580/
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
> *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The document
> will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from
> each author and contributor.
>
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
> Best regards
>
> Nic
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
>