Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-control

[Stewart Bryant <[e-mail]>]

The only relevant  IPR that  I am aware of is the IPR has already been disclosed by Cisco.

- Stewart

> On 29 Jul 2021, at 10:52, Loa Andersson <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Stewart and Siva,
> 
> You need to respond to this IPR poll.
> 
> /Lo
> 
> On 14/07/2021 21:05, Loa Andersson wrote:
>> Working Group, authors,
>> We are preparing  draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-control for the working last call. The first step is an IPR poll.
>> This mail starts this IPR poll.
>> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-control?
>> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
>> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>> There are currently no IPR disclosures directly against draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-control.
>> However there were two IPR's declared against the individual draft (draft-bryant-mpls-sfl-control) that preceded the working group document:
>> 2847 Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-bryant-
>>      mpls-sfl-control
>> 2606 Cisco's Statement about IPR related to draft-bryant-mpls-sfl-
>>      control
>> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
>> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
>> IPR. **The response needs to be sent to the MPLS WG mailing list.** The
>> document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
>> received from each author and contributor.
>> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
>> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
>> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>> /Loa
>>   mpls wg co-chair
> 
> -- 
> 
> Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
> Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: [phone]