[mpls] Help wanted in detnet

John Dowdell <john.dowdell.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 15 November 2016 05:32 UTC

Return-Path: <john.dowdell.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363E6129A21; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 21:32:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hh1YqNi0bPzP; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 21:32:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x241.google.com (mail-pg0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DEE012966C; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 21:32:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x241.google.com with SMTP id e9so10493256pgc.1; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 21:32:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=BFkNLC6M9eU4S3FaZguKtEa5poxHUtmHpu28ANwRh+4=; b=V9C8g8BesSwT/zHCw0aMfYg6m14AHxHKVXwiK0EYC7HhSdDIN/OloOa+acWxoK9afX MnDiKuBvTAGm4/VOfhR2MFAEg3Ay+C8gbIt9XEen/OtDH3ApnSQhYTLRfzOmfj1eiHtM bdA3stz8/8pRMfRvNIMaoSQ9LgDwIk1YWuc5G1ASsHhaEuIpjuAjv3237v4oxJTCaO+n qLHcEaFhIV1PQdC4bWQe26IBfy97N0pugJuMo0C3zACfaxSs+eAZ4WbqpsWyt6VHelTf c9/r6YSMzCXLMTeckAGahOolb8mebn/dnUxFwF6byjT31cKSQ0pNm0GIInkSTWrBXk53 Ytmg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=BFkNLC6M9eU4S3FaZguKtEa5poxHUtmHpu28ANwRh+4=; b=KV/nG1RtKFSv3AzJf8MuT5UBVBH2wMyGP1EnPdZsZ8xZwbB9+ag3iLToOw79WBugSN PYOClsUYnO5O8DRyMSMRIc4yP60oCIxhxTNCtVxkmQpB+/uKAGLYO/Ia1YaJBbH7QxmO XguS1aZrkiMMP9bD+PInYJdkS1YlSAMhMtUHQX0uLx+Mq5YcdygLEyQViqIEYBiDnLQ4 1iljzPzg9it95lNiOIFYXQZ7XHyHoVyQMGPnZ1KS641NaiWnaBs6wfpa7SjhYXwrOcZp bX1QBQHDh++njJ3zn02OibWL7R5RAVPo/Grh0+XnFtF4YbHds0kAE0nzhbIVFEMblwz2 hF+Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcaO0lLlqaGEB9XMTxGgNqVvXNjjtsx7GLotLryOndm5n400W1+YwyDBvYcdiU3LA==
X-Received: by 10.98.102.22 with SMTP id a22mr43293528pfc.182.1479187950669; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 21:32:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-8ed3.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-8ed3.meeting.ietf.org. [31.133.142.211]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id xk6sm39241467pab.26.2016.11.14.21.32.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Nov 2016 21:32:29 -0800 (PST)
From: John Dowdell <john.dowdell.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_04DC4861-F3EB-49D4-A036-497FB0247500"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
Message-Id: <86C8BF8E-7475-484F-89DD-62D428C96983@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:32:27 +0900
To: teas@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org, detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/BVbszACXDWW4oD54qKiShHsvk_Q>
Subject: [mpls] Help wanted in detnet
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 05:32:33 -0000

Hi all in mpls and teas groups (consolidating earlier posting only on mpls)

Over in detnet wg we are working on transporting deterministic Ethernet (e.g. from 802.1TSN LANs) across the wide area for applications such as industrial control and audio/video broadcast. One of the key assumptions is that the underlying transport already has sufficient scheduling and queueing support to allow proper extension of time-sensitive (or even time-critical) traffic over, for example, MPLS.

To help us validate that assumption, please can someone volunteer to help us? Feel free to come over to the detnet list. Recommendations on exactly which flavour(s) of MPLS and/or configurations and/or gotchas would be most welcome.

The slides in question are here https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/slides/slides-97-detnet-detnet-data-plane-02.pptx <https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/slides/slides-97-detnet-detnet-data-plane-02.pptx>, slide 4.

Many thanks in anticipation.

John