Re: [mpls] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1435/
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Fri, 12 February 2016 10:43 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFFC1B432C; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 02:43:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jQCzON9EMtDS; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 02:43:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3260B1B4333; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 02:43:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.13] (unknown [49.149.199.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44033180156E; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 11:43:23 +0100 (CET)
To: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>, Scott Mansfield <scott.mansfield@ericsson.com>
References: <56B32ED2.7020103@pi.nu> <EF35EE4B92789843B1DECBC0E24558644BE3D966@eusaamb105.ericsson.se> <56B417DB.10905@pi.nu> <EF35EE4B92789843B1DECBC0E24558644BE41AAE@eusaamb105.ericsson.se> <56B5E615.4090407@pi.nu> <EF35EE4B92789843B1DECBC0E24558644BE475A3@eusaamb105.ericsson.se> <CAA=duU0xuJrG+dabnPURwx6dX93rvdH9khpznf6GU=Mv5ZV4+g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <56BDB744.1000205@pi.nu>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 18:43:16 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU0xuJrG+dabnPURwx6dX93rvdH9khpznf6GU=Mv5ZV4+g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/Be9043WpD5kZ6p8Z-lTJAS8pLm8>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1435/
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 10:43:32 -0000
Folks, I agree s/join/joint; but is not clear if we want to change "step" to "milestone", depends on how formal we are. A milestone is something we setup and tick off when we reached. A step (in my understanding) is a bit less formal, a thing that we don't talk about beforehand, but that could be recognized when we see the step taken . Not a hard preference, but I'd stay with "step". /Loa On 2016-02-12 05:33, Andrew G. Malis wrote: > Scott, > > “join” should be “joint”. Should “a step” be “a milestone”? > > Cheers, > Andy > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Scott Mansfield > <scott.mansfield@ericsson.com <mailto:scott.mansfield@ericsson.com>> wrote: > > I have posted this reply... > https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1455/ Please review before I > send it out to the ITU-T. > > Regards, > -scott. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Loa Andersson [mailto:loa@pi.nu <mailto:loa@pi.nu>] > Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2016 7:25 AM > To: Scott Mansfield; mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>; > mpls-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:mpls-chairs@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1435/ > > Scott, > > Since I wrote the words I don't think I need to hum, but just in > case ... hhhmmmmmmmmmmmmm > > /Loa > > On 2016-02-06 06:29, Scott Mansfield wrote: > > I'm ok with this. Any other words? Please hum if you think this > is ok and I will draft it up and put it into the tool. > > > > Thanks, > > -scott. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Loa Andersson [mailto:loa@pi.nu <mailto:loa@pi.nu>] > > Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 10:33 PM > > To: Scott Mansfield; mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>; > mpls-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:mpls-chairs@ietf.org> > > Subject: Re: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1435/ > > > > Scott, > > > > So maybe just a short response. > > > > "Thanks for your liaison on the final approval of the MPLS-TP > Recommendations, this marks a step in the joint MPLS-TP project. > > > > IETF have to date published 45 MPLS-TP RFC from 7 working groups > and independent document. IETF still have 11 active Internet Drafts. > > > > We are looking forward to your support completing the MPLS-TP > project." > > > > I think you can correct grammar and spelling and send it timely. > > > > Working Group, > > > > Please comment on this? > > > > /Loa > > > > On 2016-02-04 21:13, Scott Mansfield wrote: > >> I'm willing to help, but I don’t see anything here worth > commenting on, unless there is a burning desire to make comments > now. None of the documents liaised have changed dramatically since > early 2014. > >> > >> -scott. > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Loa Andersson [mailto:loa@pi.nu <mailto:loa@pi.nu>] > >> Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 5:58 AM > >> To: mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>; mpls-chairs@ietf.org > <mailto:mpls-chairs@ietf.org>; Scott Mansfield > >> Subject: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1435/ > >> > >> Working Group, > >> > >> We have a liaison from SG15 that we need to decide on how to respond > >> to https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1435/ > >> I've asked Scott to help us coordinate this. > >> Any comments are welcome. > >> > >> /Loa > >> mpls wg co-chair > >> > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > >
- Re: [mpls] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1… Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [mpls] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1… Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [mpls] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1… Scott Mansfield
- [mpls] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1435/ Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1… Scott Mansfield
- Re: [mpls] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1… Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [mpls] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1… Scott Mansfield
- Re: [mpls] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1… Lou Berger
- Re: [mpls] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1… Ross Callon