Re: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts

Support

-sam

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 15, 2010, at 12:53 PM, George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com> wrote:

> Folks -
> 
> We have had a number of requests to extend draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay to cover more general MPLS applications.  In discussions among the authors and co-chairs, we believe that it would be less confusing to all involved to split the document into two.
> One called draft-ietf-mpls-loss-delay which covers all of the mechanisms and one called draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile.
> 
> Dan Frost has been kind enough to submit both of these proposed workgroup documents as 
> draft-frpst-mpls-loss-delay and draft-frost-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile.
> 
> This begins a one week poll to accept both of these drafts as workgroup drafts.  
> 
> A yes vote is to adopt these two drafts and terminate work on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay.
> 
> A no vote would result in the additional MPLS related content being added to draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay.
> 
> The poll ends December 22 at 24:00 UTC.
> 
> George and Loa
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls