Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Sat, 21 May 2016 16:55 UTC
Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E4512D1DC; Sat, 21 May 2016 09:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DBbauWb_Le6L; Sat, 21 May 2016 09:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x235.google.com (mail-vk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C2EA12D1DB; Sat, 21 May 2016 09:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id y2so107754466vka.3; Sat, 21 May 2016 09:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=Vwx4ksExnDgBtEBtkRhzoisrhJIE4apMwl2n+lyLRh4=; b=Ds2u59sdD515CgC58zR6WGAEqg1yjp/Gpi/JZCxXIhOYfClyt6kQE/K99lrI6AFZ5B Vu0LarPZtsNFCyhFuPMj2aXG5DILmfgxiAcbUnkxNdMO+EcnixrcdTdIepntXUjOytsX 33XG95km9jwAz7oYC45RBgwg+r8OeH42+DpV4h0pDmIzuDsxqCyjV9fg1P8bu4l/SiGB tP25Bh+jWsDuuAH1+RjrKevOSXxru3shq8iNhQwX+3za6LD1zSSWeQ+JI3K7C4fSTHEx GhY+Iw5WK9n8OO52JVU2RQh5B1sFz375X/Zd3f35tBWPwqQTv1kqUPbZHZU4gGNg+ZwM jqwQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=Vwx4ksExnDgBtEBtkRhzoisrhJIE4apMwl2n+lyLRh4=; b=YdEPJnXJneAc/eimg8HmgFTA4q/qF6gI5WtNOSNyvXfzkGZ54xvU30C/GnB7+ET7iv 1nZ3cNbJDAp3/ma5ZQXemQknT7jntkVjNTWwYRxolLos84PbVWfHtKoQ8I5C1xceFckr SBJJkaIMnaroARPteYVREITkCZc0rOn6l0sM22rjz8FlYy3yWJpbCIz6FUPy/0LcSaZ6 w7ddm0TtLIrAYOqEX4gq0KvIUbjW/jBo2sLISwo1QhsaM2Yx4+CI+hx9Ru/wrH8StMFz o1L6l3G9FNmVfny3RTbQxfpTtn2VUJgIJJ0xMfrMcFlApjMR8mtljue0QZjGwSdMY/wt Jdmg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FX5EY2MXMT2UYNn2FT2aqRFT2lf2l3yJBuopqtYYosycELQTE0peIgkGgPe18d0LrA7Uldezuw/ZC1BLA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.52.147 with SMTP id b141mr5108283vka.78.1463849708711; Sat, 21 May 2016 09:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.31.67.141 with HTTP; Sat, 21 May 2016 09:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <052c01d1b209$58d57910$0a806b30$@gmail.com>
References: <729f6a0b-6222-7100-3b79-2291870d4421@pi.nu> <052c01d1b209$58d57910$0a806b30$@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 12:55:08 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTtCYS_KnM6R3epjoSkXWuYUis0NNeYJ3uQJNjA+G01S0Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
To: Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1143f846e47a1105335d1100"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/CLB1RkWZweFBvnKcf4EIlcduIJA>
Cc: draft-saad-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org, IETF MPLS List <mpls@ietf.org>, draft-saad-mpls-static-yang@ietf.org, mpls-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 16:55:12 -0000
Support both drafts. Regards, -Pavan (co-author) On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > Support both (as co-author). > > Thanks, > > - Xufeng > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Loa Andersson [mailto:loa@pi.nu] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 6:01 AM > > To: mpls@ietf.org > > Cc: draft-saad-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org; > draft-saad-mpls-static-yang@ietf.org; > > mpls-chairs@ietf.org > > Subject: poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document > (mpls-static > > and mpls-base) > > > > > > Working Group, > > > > This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-saad-mpls-static- > > yang-03 and draft-saad-mpls-base-yang-00 as MPLS working group documents. > > > > Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working group > > mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical motivation for > your > > support/not support, especially if you think that the document should > not be > > adopted as a working group document. > > > > There are no IPR disclosures against either document. An IPR poll has > been > > started in parallel to this adoption poll > > > > The working group adoption poll ends June 2, 2016, given that the IPR > poll has > > concluded. > > > > /Loa > > > > MPLS wg co-chair. > > -- > > > > > > Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com > > Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu > > Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 > > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls >
- [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt … Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- [mpls] 答复: poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Chenxia (D)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Tarek Saad (tsaad)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Shah, Himanshu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Wen, Bin
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Mach Chen
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Raqib Jones
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Igor Bryskin
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Santosh Esale
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Loa Andersson