IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-zulr-mpls-tp-linear-protection-switching-09.txt

Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com> Fri, 31 January 2014 17:54 UTC

Return-Path: <huubatwork@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74091A1F48 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:54:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MX2yjnMfE_2J for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:54:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ea0-x22f.google.com (mail-ea0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EED81A043A for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:54:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ea0-f175.google.com with SMTP id z10so2481065ead.6 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:54:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zNzTNlQEgKDarAAzqSiFytYe4aosyuApgao/SEnWtqo=; b=Arv8uzU5m2XOCwid4jzp0qf+cMmbUeE5GKazBd7hiCmW8pJCd6JCsO9MvOM7FoBljl wPx+RHo5UJbHRo7U2g7xyUx03ja8eK12NhrlGoR+3h+tajbTyOh4z5Y7LMf16NowGK3I Cqqni4CjUtPZYe03kjU1pQUoi5nEim1+Mrwbqv+uYOOeTaYjlym1UcBcZ4Di3YkHrVYv Z8/OpY55OmG+J1L82TRqbTjKXeSiaPr+d3baMSFuUFDNVaXfqTyO8QbbLIkUWO8GzRLT rkEr1efWd0YsDUgUpdccDERrCONrAS78ThBzrkAivxo+BHAWRPjT2ZQ4jP+CiFKOivRK teTw==
X-Received: by 10.15.42.136 with SMTP id u8mr20779801eev.52.1391190887159; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:54:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from McAsterix.local (g215085.upc-g.chello.nl. [80.57.215.85]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 8sm33933181eef.1.2014.01.31.09.54.46 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:54:46 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52EBE365.8000504@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 18:54:45 +0100
From: Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <201401311734.s0VHY8U5082068@maildrop2.v6ds.occnc.com>
In-Reply-To: <201401311734.s0VHY8U5082068@maildrop2.v6ds.occnc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-zulr-mpls-tp-linear-protection-switching-09.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: huubatwork@gmail.com
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:54:52 -0000

Curtis,

You wrote:

---8<---
>>>      This document is a product of a joint Internet Engineering Task Force
>>>      (IETF) / International Telecommunications Union Telecommunications
>>>      Standardization Sector (ITU-T) effort to include an MPLS Transport
>>>      Profile within the IETF MPLS and PWE3 architectures to support the
>>>      capabilities and functionalities of a packet transport network as
>>>      defined by the ITU-T.
>
> The above paragraph is not true since this is not a product of an IETF
> WG nor is it related to the agreed upon process between ITU-T and
> IETF.  Therefore the paragraph should be removed.


The authors have already noticed this.
The paragraph will have been removed in the next version.

Regards, Huub.

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status