Re: [mpls] MPLS-RT review od draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis

["[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>]

Hi, all
This is an updated draft of RFC4379, and most of content is same as 4379. So yes, it should be adopted as WG document.
Except the to do list which still needs further evaluation, only very minor comments as below:
1. Obsoletes: 4379, 6829 (if approved) 
Why 6829 is listed, but 7506 is not? 

2. Throughout the document, "echo request" and "Echo Request"(section 3.3), "echo reply" and "Echo Reply"(section 4.4) are used. Shall we have a uniformed type? 



Regards
Lizhong
 
From: Loa Andersson
Date: 2015-11-20 10:19
To: Lizhong Jin; yshen; Curtis Villamizar; David Allan I
CC: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: MPLS-RT review od draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis
Lizhong, Yimin, Curtis, and  Dave,
 
 
You have been selected as MPLS-RT reviewers for draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis.
 
Note to authors: You have been CC'd on this email so that you can know
that this review is going on. However, please do not review your own
document.
 
Reviews should comment on whether the document is coherent, is it
useful (ie, is it likely to be actually useful in operational networks), 
and is the document technically sound?
 
We are interested in knowing whether the document is ready to be
considered for WG adoption (ie, it doesn't have to be perfect at this
point, but should be a good start).
 
This MPLS-RT review is a bit different in that it is a bis-version of
a widely implemented and deployed protocol, however the basic question
is the same - are we ready to adopt it as a wg document? If the meet
all the criteria LSP Ping will be progressed to Internet Standard.
 
Reviews should be sent to the document authors, WG co-chairs and WG
secretary, and CC'd to the MPLS WG email list. If necessary, comments
may be sent privately to only the WG chairs.
 
If you have technical comments you should try to be explicit about what
needs to be resolved before adopting it as a working group document, and
what can wait until the document is a working group document and the
working group has the revision control.
 
Are you able to review this draft by December 6, 2015? Please respond
in a timely fashion.
 
Thanks, Loa
(as MPLS WG chair)
 
 
-- 
 
 
Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: [phone]