Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registry

t.petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Fri, 03 May 2013 17:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9922721F96B2 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 May 2013 10:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.000, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2-dYH0ztRSi4 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 May 2013 10:36:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co9ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [207.46.163.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBE721F8EB9 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 May 2013 10:16:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail15-co9-R.bigfish.com (10.236.132.244) by CO9EHSOBE007.bigfish.com (10.236.130.70) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 3 May 2013 17:16:40 +0000
Received: from mail15-co9 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail15-co9-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEDA82A0404; Fri, 3 May 2013 17:16:40 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.250.69; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:AMXPRD0711HT001.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -14
X-BigFish: PS-14(zz9371I542I4015Izz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz8275bh8275dh8275ch1033ILz2dh2a8h5a9h668h839h947hd24hf0ah1177h1179h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah139eh13b6h1441h1504h1537h162dh1631h1758h17f1h184fh1898h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh304l1d11m1155h)
Received: from mail15-co9 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail15-co9 (MessageSwitch) id 136760139991702_23123; Fri, 3 May 2013 17:16:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CO9EHSMHS032.bigfish.com (unknown [10.236.132.254]) by mail15-co9.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119C020163; Fri, 3 May 2013 17:16:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from AMXPRD0711HT001.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (157.56.250.69) by CO9EHSMHS032.bigfish.com (10.236.130.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 3 May 2013 17:16:37 +0000
Received: from AMXPRD0310HT002.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (157.56.248.133) by pod51017.outlook.com (10.242.9.162) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.305.3; Fri, 3 May 2013 17:16:02 +0000
Message-ID: <02ab01ce4821$2c77ea60$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>, mpls@ietf.org
References: <62CCD4C52ACDAD4481149BD5D8A72FD316C38BCF@CH1PRD0510MB355.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 18:10:25 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Originating-IP: [157.56.248.133]
X-FOPE-CRA-Verdict: 157.56.250.69$juniper.net%12218%4%btconnect.com%False%False%0$
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
Cc: mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registry
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 17:36:56 -0000

Ross,

I'm a co-author and I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Tom Petch


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ross Callon" <rcallon@juniper.net>
To: "Loa Andersson" <loa@mail01.huawei.com>; <mach.chen@huawei.com>;
<tomSecurity@network-engineer.co.uk>; <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>; "Martin Vigoureux"
<martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 5:25 PM
Subject: IPR poll on draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registry


Working Group and authors;

draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registry is nearly ready to be
called
for potential WG adoption.

Before the call for adoption, we would like to check whether there is
IPR on the
document that needs to be disclosed.

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to
draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registry?
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
this email
regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The
response needs
to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list. The documents will not advance
to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and
contributor.

If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Thanks, Ross
(as MPLS WG co-chair)