Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to make draft-osborne-mpls-psc-updates a working group document

"Eric Osborne (eosborne)" <eosborne@cisco.com> Fri, 04 October 2013 13:17 UTC

From: "Eric Osborne (eosborne)" <eosborne@cisco.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: poll to see if we have consensus to make draft-osborne-mpls-psc-updates a working group document
Thread-Index: AQHOwP70Kq9S5ThfsEGSLQspPzTX55nkgqyA
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 13:05:07 +0000
Message-ID: <20ECF67871905846A80F77F8F4A2757210407C64@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
References: <524EB743.6040107@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <524EB743.6040107@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "draft-osborne-mpls-psc-updates@tools.ietf.org" <draft-osborne-mpls-psc-updates@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to make draft-osborne-mpls-psc-updates a working group document
Precedence: list

Support (as author).





eric

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loa Andersson [mailto:loa@pi.nu]
> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 8:41 AM
> To: mpls@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-osborne-mpls-psc-updates@tools.ietf.org; VIGOUREUX, MARTIN
> (MARTIN); mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: poll to see if we have consensus to make draft-osborne-mpls-
> psc-updates a working group document
> 
> Working Group,
> 
> This is to start a two week poll on to see if we have consensus to adopt
> draft-osborne-mpls-psc-updates-03 as an MPLS working group document.
> 
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> group mailing list (mpls at ietf.org). Please give a technical
> motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
> the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
> 
> Please note that this document only updates RFC6378 and that we chosen
> this path rather than do a RFC6378bis.
> 
> This poll ends October 18, 2013.
> 
> There are no IPR claims disclosed against this document.
> 
> The author has stated on the working group mailing list that he is
> not aware of any IPRs related to this draft.
> However if you are on the the mpls working group mailing list and
> aware of IPR that relates to this draft, the time to disclose
> this is now.
> 
> /Loa
> (mpls wg co-chair)
> --
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64

[mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to make d… Loa Andersson
Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ma… Eric Osborne (eosborne)
Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ma… Scott Mansfield
Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ma… Kyung-Yeop Hong (hongk)
Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ma… Huub van Helvoort
[mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to make d… Jeff Tantsura
Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ma… Andrew G. Malis
Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ma… Gregory Mirsky
Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ma… Malcolm.BETTS
Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ma… Shah, Himanshu
[mpls] R: poll to see if we have consensus to mak… D'Alessandro Alessandro Gerardo
Re: [mpls] R: poll to see if we have consensus to… Daniele Ceccarelli
Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ma… Aidan Copeland
Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ma… zhang.fei3
Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ma… Mach Chen
[mpls] Closed - Re: poll to see if we have consen… Loa Andersson