IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Re: Poll: IOAM and PSD

Fabian Ihle <fabian.ihle@uni-tuebingen.de> Wed, 07 August 2024 07:22 UTC

Return-Path: <fabian.ihle@uni-tuebingen.de>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B1AC14F74A for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 00:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=uni-tuebingen.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2w5TLXjxHCsT for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 00:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx04.uni-tuebingen.de (mx04.uni-tuebingen.de [IPv6:2001:7c0:300c:3105::8602:5d6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D387DC14F685 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 00:22:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.1.10.102] (p5488636d.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.136.99.109]) by mx04.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49F5E20A4F82 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 09:22:05 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx04.uni-tuebingen.de 49F5E20A4F82
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uni-tuebingen.de; s=20211202prod; t=1723015325; bh=X806liRG3JMz+Mxmz8uvV8it4EhQX3UFqOcOTjmpgzI=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=JgmVw8xBxJtooeFTEThRbHDGohI4BH0Rka42XQypc93fYJjpxxxmGh5FrVsRP09H0 +j2V+MF/KYokckE2p/pr3eZ6x2+5gWdBFJHAR4QQ1eeUWMLK7a3FKWQ3PovtfHHZ7J nrUVaekGYp1OqAOpTGHVUbULQ/HMYfm4YAztjW0Wl6P16z8wyUWpbPPe0S6nBbDJbm Ztz7GMsV6caVlHAH+mexHNu9NtBZ0kspkGEDLUpRWHg/tSxuuPX/RbY5g4FUBHgT1D S0ngEyfbiJGwUUX38zPPwrmeheYfvZJzl/h/A3ox4RBOtmcPKwa2X/9cflDFP0lPI1 DeuYut45fD+Vw==
Message-ID: <2acf3940-c001-4687-8fff-d3e3df2e64e9@uni-tuebingen.de>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2024 09:22:03 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: mpls@ietf.org
References: <F78CB19B-2880-48AB-99CE-D46280014A87@tony.li>
From: Fabian Ihle <fabian.ihle@uni-tuebingen.de>
In-Reply-To: <F78CB19B-2880-48AB-99CE-D46280014A87@tony.li>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-512"; boundary="------------ms000105080304050802070007"
Message-ID-Hash: KSWJE456Q3NYFO3ANDGJCF6RJZRJ2FBJ
X-Message-ID-Hash: KSWJE456Q3NYFO3ANDGJCF6RJZRJ2FBJ
X-MailFrom: fabian.ihle@uni-tuebingen.de
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [mpls] Re: Poll: IOAM and PSD
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/DLhp8ndMpiThXpnNAEJaMHd_9mI>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

Hi all,

 1.      There are many flavors of IOAM.  Which ones would you like to
    deploy/implement with MNA?

          We would like to explore and implement the IOAM types 
Direct-Export, Proof-of-Transit and pre-allocated trace in MNA.

 2.      Do you have other applications of MNA that have not been
    proposed yet?

          Nothing worth mentioning (yet), but a framework like MNA 
leaves room for future applications.

Best,

Fabian

Am 30.07.2024 um 17:25 schrieb Tony Li:
>
> [WG chair hat: on]
>
> Hi all,
>
> We’ve had many discussions about IOAM and PSD over the last few years. 
> We need to reach consensus on the problems that need to be addressed 
> in these areas. Therefore, we would like to hear from everyone, 
> especially independent operators:
>
> 1.
>
>     There are many flavors of IOAM.  Which ones would you like to
>     deploy/implement with MNA?
>
> 2.
>
>     Do you have other applications of MNA that have not been proposed yet?
>
>  This poll will close in two weeks, at 9am PDT, Aug 13.
>
> Regards,
>
> MPLS chairs
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list --mpls@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email tompls-leave@ietf.org

-- 
Fabian Ihle
Universität Tübingen
Fachbereich Informatik Lehrstuhl Kommunikationsnetze
Wilhelm-Schickard-Institut für Informatik
Sand 13, 72076 Tübingen

Raum: B303
Telefonnr.: +49 7071 29-70545
E-Mail:fabian.ihle@uni-tuebingen.de
Internet: uni-tuebingen.de

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status