Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopting draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping as an MPLS wg document
Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Sun, 24 May 2015 21:38 UTC
Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C1D41AD2EE for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 May 2015 14:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ObYYZkz08Eel for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 May 2015 14:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0102.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 913561AD2DF for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 May 2015 14:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.162.224.27) by BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.162.224.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.172.22; Sun, 24 May 2015 21:38:01 +0000
Received: from BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.162.224.27]) by BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.162.224.27]) with mapi id 15.01.0172.012; Sun, 24 May 2015 21:38:01 +0000
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, 'Loa Andersson' <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping@tools.ietf.org" <draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping@tools.ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopting draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping as an MPLS wg document
Thread-Index: AQGPBSUHLT6Yhr1Sj3be+DuaUdYTOJ4MFrjQgAKykVA=
Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 21:38:00 +0000
Message-ID: <BLUPR05MB198568FC462105201D079D53AECE0@BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <555C5A1D.7020709@pi.nu> <030c01d09512$03e93730$0bbba590$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <030c01d09512$03e93730$0bbba590$@olddog.co.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rbonica@juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.13]
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR05MB1985;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR05MB1985DAB97C398222B090AE54AECE0@BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(520002)(3002001); SRVR:BLUPR05MB1985; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR05MB1985;
x-forefront-prvs: 058637CA05
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(189002)(377454003)(199003)(252514010)(52604005)(13464003)(51704005)(37854004)(5001770100001)(2656002)(54356999)(19580395003)(122556002)(50986999)(87936001)(66066001)(19580405001)(46102003)(106116001)(81156007)(4001540100001)(76176999)(106356001)(92566002)(97736004)(105586002)(99286002)(101416001)(40100003)(230783001)(33656002)(2501003)(77156002)(62966003)(68736005)(2900100001)(2950100001)(2201001)(189998001)(5001960100002)(15975445007)(64706001)(107886002)(102836002)(74316001)(86362001)(76576001)(5001830100001)(5001860100001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR05MB1985; H:BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 24 May 2015 21:38:00.2487 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR05MB1985
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/DR5Cjp5ucpdSabWVuWD5c67srzs>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopting draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping as an MPLS wg document
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 21:38:27 -0000
Adrian, Thanks for calling my attention to RFC 6383! I will reference it in the next revision of the draft. Ron > -----Original Message----- > From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk] > Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 12:36 AM > To: 'Loa Andersson'; mpls@ietf.org; draft-bonica-mpls-self- > ping@tools.ietf.org; mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org > Subject: RE: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopting draft-bonica- > mpls-self-ping as an MPLS wg document > > Hi Loa, > > I think this is a useful tool and the document is stable enough to be within > the working group. > > The explanation of why the function is needed (which really clarifies how it is > used) would be enhanced by reference to RFC 6383 which describes the > problems associated with RSVP-TE signaling and LSP establishment. > > Cheers, > Adrian > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson > > Sent: 20 May 2015 10:56 > > To: mpls@ietf.org; draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping@tools.ietf.org; mpls- > > chairs@tools.ietf.org > > Subject: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopting > draft-bonica-mpls-self- > > ping as an MPLS wg document > > > > Working Group, > > > > This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-bonica-mpls-self- > > ping-06 as an MPLS working group document. > > > > Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working > > group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical motivation > > for your support/not support, especially if you think that the > > document should not be adopted as a working group document. > > > > There is one IPR disclosures directly against this document. All the > > authors has stated on the working group mailing that they are unaware > > of any undisclosed IPRs against this document. > > > > However if you are on the the mpls working group mailing list and > > aware of IPR that relates to this draft, the time to disclose this is > > now. > > > > This poll ends June 5, 2015. > > > > /Loa > > -- > > > > > > Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com > > Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu > > Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > mpls mailing list > > mpls@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
- [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopting … Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopt… Conn, Michael
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopt… Tomotaki, Luis M
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopt… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopt… Ronald Bonica
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopt… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopt… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopt… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopt… Wygant, Mark
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopt… Santosh Esale
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopt… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopt… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopt… Minjie Dai
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopt… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopt… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopt… Raveendra Torvi
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopt… Mach Chen
- [mpls] Closed - Re: Poll to see if we have consen… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopt… Lizhong Jin