[mpls] FW: New Version Notification for draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-errata-01.txt

"Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)" <naikumar@cisco.com> Wed, 19 December 2018 01:03 UTC

Return-Path: <naikumar@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 637BB130DEE; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:03:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.566
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.065, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iWP8NxmXDxuJ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:03:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 683BE130DE8; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:03:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2928; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1545181392; x=1546390992; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=2WKZXRmqmPDvIFJ8Zomvzm1KtuGpqt/z/aACyQmeIYk=; b=kO2Mmk0JcYZSq+HR3mzeG/mYWRjUSbkfhQG91fKAQLJqhhVNUCehwlFe bxW6BQBgT8Xhs4rXg4fN+cgib9czSXoLlalDpsc4/44oKEwKkPuyW0s7L 8qP3s9BML05h9L0av5CsPF3qLIPMJlBZAfPX6iL1hhi1D1huSmTmas/Zn 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ADAAAKmBlc/5pdJa1kGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUQQBAQEBAQsBgVUuZoECJwqDc4gZi3yDCZZegXsLAQElhEcCF4JEIjQJDQEDAQECAQECbRwBC4U9BiMRQwIQAgEIGgImAgICMBUGAQYDAgQOBYMiAYIAD6ZngS+EMQIOQD+EcIELizQXgX+BEScfghc1gx4BAQIBARaETzGCJgKJQoYQkVIJAocNilESBoFdTYRSiluJRIR3ixECERSBJx84KIEucBUaSwGCQQmLE4U/QTEBjUeBHwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,370,1539648000"; d="scan'208";a="214514899"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Dec 2018 01:03:11 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-012.cisco.com (xch-aln-012.cisco.com [173.36.7.22]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id wBJ13B14023188 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 19 Dec 2018 01:03:11 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-015.cisco.com (173.37.102.25) by XCH-ALN-012.cisco.com (173.36.7.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 19:03:10 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-015.cisco.com ([173.37.102.25]) by XCH-RCD-015.cisco.com ([173.37.102.25]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 19:03:10 -0600
From: "Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)" <naikumar@cisco.com>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-errata@ietf.org" <draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-errata@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-errata-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHUlzYzj+6yiBVTZUahwr06ySSAhqWFT44A
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 01:03:10 +0000
Message-ID: <E26A2539-C949-41BF-B781-84E9FF225D8D@cisco.com>
References: <154518120512.5681.1872757757162548481.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <154518120512.5681.1872757757162548481.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.a.0.180210
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.118.20.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <F2299B22D53C674BAADE394D5342BF5C@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.22, xch-aln-012.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/DXya_BAKqihR4nXpQPvaZPZlxFo>
Subject: [mpls] FW: New Version Notification for draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-errata-01.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 01:03:14 -0000

Hi,

This is a simple draft that clarifies the Length fields in new Target FEC Stack Sub-TLVs proposed as part of RFC8287. We, the authors would like to request the chair to consider for WG adoption.

Thanks,
Nagendra

On 12/18/18, 8:00 PM, "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

    
    A new version of I-D, draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-errata-01.txt
    has been successfully submitted by Nagendra Kumar Nainar and posted to the
    IETF repository.
    
    Name:		draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-errata
    Revision:	01
    Title:		RFC8287 Sub-TLV Length Clarification
    Document date:	2018-12-18
    Group:		Individual Submission
    Pages:		6
    URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-errata-01.txt
    Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-errata/
    Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-errata-01
    Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-errata
    Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-errata-01
    
    Abstract:
       RFC8287 defines the extensions to MPLS LSP Ping and Traceroute for
       Segment Routing IGP-Prefix and IGP-Adjacency Segment Identifier
       (SIDs) with an MPLS data plane.  RFC8287 proposes 3 Target FEC Stack
       Sub-TLVs.  While the standard defines the format and procedure to
       handle those Sub-TLVs, it does not sufficiently clarify how the
       length of the Segment ID Sub-TLVs should be computed to include in
       the Length field of the Sub-TLVs which may result in interoperability
       issues.
    
       This document updates RFC8287 by clarifying the length of each
       Segment ID Sub-TLVs defined in RFC8287.
    
                                                                                      
    
    
    Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
    until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
    
    The IETF Secretariat