Re: [mpls] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-14: (with COMMENT)

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Mon, 27 February 2017 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE0512A182; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 07:55:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hr4cAzR4MHcY; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 07:55:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot0-x231.google.com (mail-ot0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F5BA12A181; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 07:55:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot0-x231.google.com with SMTP id k4so54356970otc.0; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 07:55:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Dv3kztKpIDVY+4s70scZ9JAqM6N0yrLrygYa0JwT5SU=; b=hau1JI5nOKaEjbfpj1B2hhzjgBSWKsXGWPLoivX/tzmDwi4Dv3EXSYKTcRQo+ZrFuD QISBagYyohlfHBORbpIEJ1vthiDSQ67u0ywVO8CY3Y4uvQOtITGZzbgoqDalhjENNUPH IvZ1fs+4qh26hogHPbVaeYF+sJTfi2pYRmsDNDjtl96TJWlIWB6BDO9uI6CGR7fYF84M AbuwyKNYDDD54DmttWdNkzJLjZ6sm2mfSgiq78fF1Jd0HF53sxSEDXOdGeyknj6EtcfV q3QVEkqnMI182aKL5LyJZjnL6X1rej+Q+2P0jEtVQSVxbC/9cEL4s+s0Wi822PMCWs02 lTsg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Dv3kztKpIDVY+4s70scZ9JAqM6N0yrLrygYa0JwT5SU=; b=RRPFuMC9kk/WHXEyH3HG9t5MjNpUvkAE2vkxl18pya+TUmJI+Lemaz1RG4+NSejUCF Pj8ODc6wTX1epy0xchZWf7ysrHxLLz0sspDkzzzzTdgtcQXu0SieDMx+/6U5zrV89CT5 JnLOhM7yu/2QE75brJArgVo3HdwX5o/kta5vnLaCyEAKsiBCaCUXTqHsnk8vuJS14GdV cUVCO+nRsSoY3YXI/tvSJLops0Dp9Rrx38Y8XODag4gWMydEQq7YiDeNbf3Yai91JSdk hTvUacxNPcDER+sECWMnbTiMCqTRhkA3FhXGwDi5lbOHDwUZX4x3/Byq0V3TtDasSo88 22IQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nr+Deb3ORmSmNxBwdqOivLOeo9IuugvitUm/6bZu9IGV0C3spxQAl0bb45uTCivpmATYD9RKMoNm7HWA==
X-Received: by 10.157.1.229 with SMTP id e92mr7996691ote.40.1488210948061; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 07:55:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.21.21 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 07:55:47 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <148814606376.2949.10868917655692470857.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <148814606376.2949.10868917655692470857.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 07:55:47 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmXFjsYEmhEPbcWr143GtM0DDDaAoaGrfCL8BNE+F7qTwg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c03c39ae902cf0549851c15
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/DsShADfEzZjRzCvOeCbbYhm6QFU>
Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time@ietf.org, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:55:50 -0000

Hi Spencer,
thank you for your thorough review and the question.
NTP yet doesn't use transparent clock paradigm but in section 3 G-ACh for
Residence Time Measurement we've noted that NTP may be one type of TLV and
have requested appropriate allocation by IANA in the new sub-registry MPLS
RTM TLV Registry (section 7.2). Thus, if NTP will be enhanced to use
transparent clock, the RTM over MPLS will be capable to support it.
We're open to your suggestions to make it clearer.

Kind regards,
Greg

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Spencer Dawkins <
spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>; wrote:

> Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-14: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I'm a bit confused on one point. There's one reference to NTP in the
> Introduction, everything else is about PTP, but the specification never
> actually says if this mechanism is intended to be usable for NTP as well.
> Could that be clearer?
>
>
>