[mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple-05.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Sat, 10 October 2015 00:57 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E081B50CC; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 17:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dJncCaS_o3HW; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 17:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A991B50C4; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 17:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.4.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20151010005725.11168.41433.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 17:57:25 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/Dv2_mdCtGs0xWx7jChf99pxZCvc>
Cc: mpls@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple-05.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 00:57:26 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working Group of the IETF. Title : Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping/Traceroute Reply Mode Simplification Authors : Nobo Akiya George Swallow Carlos Pignataro Loa Andersson Mach(Guoyi) Chen Filename : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple-05.txt Pages : 16 Date : 2015-10-09 Abstract: The Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping and Traceroute use the Reply Mode field to signal the method to be used in the MPLS echo reply. This document updates the procedures for the "Reply via Specified Path" Reply Mode, the value of this Reply Mode is 5. The update creates a simple way to indicate that the Reverse LSP should be used as return path. This document also adds an optional TLV which can carry ordered list of Reply Mode values. This document updates RFC7110. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple-05 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple-05 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply… internet-drafts