Re: [mpls] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 03 May 2019 21:44 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C07F120099; Fri, 3 May 2019 14:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hz9YDCU2d7eV; Fri, 3 May 2019 14:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x329.google.com (mail-ot1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::329]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ED5B120130; Fri, 3 May 2019 14:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x329.google.com with SMTP id u3so1158477otq.4; Fri, 03 May 2019 14:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=r7YgH36d8Dopuy3YpMGZ5fxwDv/QhWzM4abTGYf4fLg=; b=LIyrFVKTt6UkaZkt2tAtgZ06hWYGbm7Qt/Pcjt95OKzX44V7rlrvVMK3IA5dtoMQAe rX+fdeaN8vdWPiZmLApSXUiOCeUHjYyYWtFTDW0BBHyr4Gv1d2TANUnv9ANDhjUdg9nz 8jUrbnPOUA7k16UG/8PrgHqyofXGC1Es/hbQwJjCQRvOKLcckYNIJXyC/rAYjpIQBRIw SNQg6DqtdoSVpM+X8AviIyuSEJXflGD4i7E2QZ2BGHTkY6XX/YNFW7wq/g7pvUAa1Bxk jEUuK9CmV1YX2p4IHhtTnNtwPLGFrH8BHnJCW/9vwL1ybdtXV0Ys61X6urlEJeLHaiPq vkxg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=r7YgH36d8Dopuy3YpMGZ5fxwDv/QhWzM4abTGYf4fLg=; b=BksS1OfpqjhtZSNBvzSXhUvDbX+ym3PevGMBt4ODtNcAEYYWDd/MyOf3canpgvFwE7 oFcwAlj1G3UeCl4NfjWheUh9HnNPtKZRIa4GP6C/TVd7bY4NpdIhXZSevGwzDGmvJmOX WREKyFCFubk32oStdz7H7I+PJS/0Tkalpc7tHG804jcx6LMZ5VBUYOUeNCvkp8fq9B4R dW9RnM7KKKo53V4tgl9oBS6XaiIVjhPZ1G5zWkC5hKfiGXGy0xPRbM+m+zFNbpJnubCV 07orBQpCBFrVMM8jYX4YKa+B19RdWUrRybRWlPhJ9DJSFId1zbfV+PLwo/N9nQU8c4T/ PjNw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVXPSREEOUjUJmNhrn6Um2w2QSzSn1i4gd78vkPr0daIhMihEcr wWSiv6z9wVgCsX98uhjhYMVX2O02vVTGwysbJCY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyvHOdOitin2R4DokrNZ5UAd3L9ClmvTOZf+a993oyPD6YByFSqF9x03paE36xax64BxvbPgS4lPDflP4EEq4k=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:210b:: with SMTP id i11mr8368928otc.239.1556919850891; Fri, 03 May 2019 14:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 3 May 2019 14:44:10 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <07b401d4f218$d49023a0$7db06ae0$@olddog.co.uk>
References: <155252870218.24914.13341927320393340552.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <07b401d4f218$d49023a0$7db06ae0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 14:44:10 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESswrDAS=UZ8=+iWsK5kt=-N7EN397wf1o5T02M_AzfsLYA@mail.gmail.com>
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a7fe82058802a647"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/E5pZF__eM9yTgCd0sH421dtx8Qs>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 21:44:15 -0000

On April 13, 2019 at 12:49:18 PM, Adrian Farrel (adrian@olddog.co.uk) wrote:

Adrian:

Hi!

...

> (3) A very, very late IPR declaration came in after the IETF LC started. I

> didn't find a thread where the WG was made aware of it.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3439/
...


This IPR was brought to the attention of the WG by the disclosure email on
2/28 and again by your Discuss email on 3/14.

Do you now consider that enough opportunity for discussion has happened?

That is a call that the Chairs and/or the Responsible AD should make — they
know the dynamics of the WG better than I do.

Can we close that part of your Discuss?

If the Chairs/AD are ok, then I’m ok too.

Alvaro.