Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-farrelll-mpls-opportunistic-encrypt as an MPLS wg document

[Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>]

Working Group,

This working group adoption poll has ended. We have a new working group
document. Can the authors please post the draft as
draft-ietf-mpls-opportunistic-encrypt, without any other than
administrative changes.

The working group chairs like to note that we are accepting the
document as an Experimental draft (intended to become an Experimental
RFC), this means that while we have consensus to accept the document,
we also have consensus on that one or more experiments are necessary
to reach consensus on what a solution (if any) will look like.

/Loa
  for the wg chairs

On 2015-06-18 11:12, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-farrelll-
> mpls-opportunistic-encrypt-05 as an MPLS working group document.
>
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> group mailing list ([e-mail]). Please give a technical
> motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
> the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
>
> There are no IPR disclosures directly against this document. An IPR
> poll has been started in parallel to the adoption poll.
>
> This poll ends July 2, 2015.
>
> /Loa
> MPLS wg co-chair