[mpls] Re: Poll: IOAM and PSD

[Rakesh Gandhi <[e-mail]>]

Hi Tony,

I would like to implement two IOAM option-types with MNA, namely,
               -  Pre-allocated Trace (value 0) and
               -  Direct-Export (value 4)


Thanks,
Rakesh
P.S.
Email reply:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/NvvjfB7eZ5B4BbI1afTsr55qOK4/


On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 11:42 AM Tony Li <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
> [WG chair hat: on]
>
> Hi all,
>
> Last week, we started a poll on IOAM and PSD. This provoked discussion,
> but so far, the chairs have received one direct response (Greg Mirsky,
> 2024-08-03) to this poll.
>
> We need responses to be clear, direct, and unambiguous, so that there is
> no possibility of misinterpretation, so that we can judge consensus fairly.
>
> If there are insufficient responses, we will have to conclude that there
> is insufficient interest in this work item.
>
> Regards,
> MPLS chairs
>
>
>
> On Jul 30, 2024, at 8:25 AM, Tony Li <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> [WG chair hat: on]
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> We’ve had many discussions about IOAM and PSD over the last few years. We
> need to reach consensus on the problems that need to be addressed in these
> areas. Therefore, we would like to hear from everyone, especially
> independent operators:
>
>
>
>    1. There are many flavors of IOAM.  Which ones would you like to
>    deploy/implement with MNA?
>    2. Do you have other applications of MNA that have not been proposed
>    yet?
>
>
>  This poll will close in two weeks, at 9am PDT, Aug 13.
>
>
> Regards,
> MPLS chairs
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>