Re: [mpls] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed

Gregory Mirsky <> Tue, 08 March 2016 18:42 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235B412D9A2; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 10:42:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jTJGD_3VNvg2; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 10:42:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFAFA12D9A1; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 10:42:44 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c6180641-f799c6d000007d66-10-56df1d06775e
Received: from (Unknown_Domain []) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id B1.8E.32102.60D1FD65; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 19:42:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 13:42:43 -0500
From: Gregory Mirsky <>
To: Ross Callon <>, Jeff Tantsura <>, Ilya Varlashkin <>, Mach Chen <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: IPR Poll for draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed
Thread-Index: AQHReWV9Rlhl6Ry67kCUqsHITJAR9p9P39YA
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 18:42:41 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221A05D7Aeusaamb103erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrFIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPoC6b7P0wgytbpSzaN3UxW1xYK2yx 7vIpNotbS1eyWvxdcYXFgdWj5chbVo8lS34yeVxvusrusei2eQBLFJdNSmpOZllqkb5dAldG +9/5rAUvkyoOb2lkamA8GNHFyMkhIWAisWndHRYIW0ziwr31bF2MXBxCAkcYJebcaYFyljFK TL/0gxGkik3ASOLFxh52kISIwB5Gid1b5oMlmAUMJSZO3M8MYgsLmEnMnP2MCcQWETCXmLro CSOEbSSx589SNhCbRUBF4sm3NrA4r4CvxIlDM8HiQgJREve2rQA7iVMgWmLh3f1gNYxA530/ tYYJYpe4xK0n85kgzhaQWLLnPDOELSrx8vE/VghbSWLS0nNANgdQfb7Ewsm+EKsEJU7OfMIy gVF0FpJJsxCqZiGpgijRkViw+xMbhK0tsWzha2YY+8yBx0zI4gsY2VcxcpQWF+TkphsZbmIE xuAxCTbHHYx7ez0PMQpwMCrx8H5gvxcmxJpYVlyZe4hRgoNZSYSXSeZ+mBBvSmJlVWpRfnxR aU5q8SFGaQ4WJXHebx8vhwkJpCeWpGanphakFsFkmTg4pRoY5yVp/bA9E9567vSxr70ek/Ka M9uZ38hOV395U2D6i2U+SXEPJq4LMzq3Ly31mbVqsYJAsbbYLUP+rZUCdzUT9dN3JkmJnpga 7yslG3rWcMqMQ4/0pswJn8z5zTVo0uccBuNPn8we/mtapql/bvFVlZeSeY6d9cm6S4+qbfZs rj2x4Y1akOUhJZbijERDLeai4kQAwnJF3b0CAAA=
Archived-At: <>
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 18:42:47 -0000

Dear Ross, et. al,
I'm not aware of any IPR other than the one that already been disclosed,


From: Ross Callon []
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 10:08 AM
To: Gregory Mirsky; Jeff Tantsura; Ilya Varlashkin; Mach Chen;
Subject: IPR Poll for draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed

Working Group,

The authors of draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed have told us that the
draft is ready for working group last call (WGLC).

Before we do the WGLC we want to do an IPR poll on the document.

This mail starts that IPR poll.

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

Currently there is one IPR disclosure on draft-mirsky-mpls-bfd-directed
(which was the pre-working group version of draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed):

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The
document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Thanks, Ross
(as MPLS WG co-chair)