Re: [mpls] Progressing Resdience Time Measurement draft

Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com> Fri, 29 January 2016 16:28 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED291A00B7 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 08:28:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ldzGRv0DkRVu for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 08:28:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 892041A036F for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 08:28:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fr712umx4.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.245.210.45]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 426963BC5D492 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 16:28:46 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.42]) by fr712umx4.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO-o) with ESMTP id u0TGSmI3015588 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 16:28:48 GMT
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u0TGSlHd022918 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 17:28:48 +0100
Received: from [135.224.219.106] (135.239.27.41) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 17:28:47 +0100
Message-ID: <56AB933E.7000700@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 17:28:46 +0100
From: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mpls@ietf.org
References: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221965953@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <566F8799.1070305@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <566F8799.1070305@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [135.239.27.41]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/EXNKUJfyvevGoGeP6BEc9ExUKoY>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Progressing Resdience Time Measurement draft
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 16:28:53 -0000

Loa,

although it is a fairly recent WG Document, it has gone through several 
revisions as an individual document and has been subject to external 
reviews.

I believe you can start the WG LC, which is anyway a time during which 
reviews and comments are welcome/expected.

-m

Le 15/12/2015 04:23, Loa Andersson a écrit :
>
> Working Group and authors,
>
> <chair hat off>
> As a matter of fact I believe this document should be progressed.
> <chair hat on>
> This draft has been a working group document since early August, but
> there has been no discussion on the document on the wg mailing list.
>
> There are of course two ways if interpreting this.
> - there is total agreement on the draft
> - there is no intrest in the draft
>
> I have no basis to decide which is the case.
>
> Can we plese have at least a few (non-author) comments on the mailing
> list if it is time to start the wglc.
>
> /Loa
> mpls wg co-chair
>
> On 2015-12-15 07:21, Gregory Mirsky wrote:
>> Dear Chairs of the MPLS WG,
>>
>> authors of the Residence Time Measurement in MPLS Network draft believe
>> that all comments received during the WG adoption call been addressed.
>> Thus, authors would like to ask the WG Chairs to consider WG LC as the
>> next step.
>>
>>                  Regards,
>>
>>                                  Greg
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
>