Re: [mpls] Progressing Resdience Time Measurement draft

Loa,

although it is a fairly recent WG Document, it has gone through several 
revisions as an individual document and has been subject to external 
reviews.

I believe you can start the WG LC, which is anyway a time during which 
reviews and comments are welcome/expected.

-m

Le 15/12/2015 04:23, Loa Andersson a écrit :
>
> Working Group and authors,
>
> <chair hat off>
> As a matter of fact I believe this document should be progressed.
> <chair hat on>
> This draft has been a working group document since early August, but
> there has been no discussion on the document on the wg mailing list.
>
> There are of course two ways if interpreting this.
> - there is total agreement on the draft
> - there is no intrest in the draft
>
> I have no basis to decide which is the case.
>
> Can we plese have at least a few (non-author) comments on the mailing
> list if it is time to start the wglc.
>
> /Loa
> mpls wg co-chair
>
> On 2015-12-15 07:21, Gregory Mirsky wrote:
>> Dear Chairs of the MPLS WG,
>>
>> authors of the Residence Time Measurement in MPLS Network draft believe
>> that all comments received during the WG adoption call been addressed.
>> Thus, authors would like to ask the WG Chairs to consider WG LC as the
>> next step.
>>
>>                  Regards,
>>
>>                                  Greg
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
>