[mpls] [Errata Verified] RFC4090 (6939)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 26 May 2022 13:45 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 869EAC1850DE; Thu, 26 May 2022 06:45:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xVanqmBVFowi; Thu, 26 May 2022 06:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC029C139541; Thu, 26 May 2022 06:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 8F204E530F; Thu, 26 May 2022 06:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
To: gmalyushkin@gmail.com, ppan@hammerheadsystems.com, swallow@cisco.com, aatlas@avici.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: andrew-ietf@liquid.tech, iesg@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20220526134522.8F204E530F@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 06:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/EXV99ZBJ7zSEVSBSq36c3FC5b4Y>
Subject: [mpls] [Errata Verified] RFC4090 (6939)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 13:45:26 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC4090,
"Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6939

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported by: Igor Malyushkin <gmalyushkin@gmail.com>
Date Reported: 2022-04-20
Verified by: Andrew Alston (IESG)

Section: 4.4

Original Text
-------------
To report whether bandwidth and/or node protection are provided as requested, we define two new flags in the RRO IPv4 sub-object.

Corrected Text
--------------
To report whether bandwidth and/or node protection are provided as requested, we define two new flags in the RRO IPv4 sub-object and RRO IPv6 sub-object.

Notes
-----
Forgotten IPv6 sub-object. The title of the section implies the usage of both versions of IP protocol. Later in this section (and the document), both sub-objects are also referred to.

--------------------------------------
RFC4090 (draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-lsp-fastreroute-07)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels
Publication Date    : May 2005
Author(s)           : P. Pan, Ed., G. Swallow, Ed., A. Atlas, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Multiprotocol Label Switching
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG