Return-Path: X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3441AE1D2; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 02:21:49 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.44 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.44 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CX4kapA9sL_D; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 02:21:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx11.netapp.com (mx11.netapp.com [216.240.18.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21701AE1D9; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 02:21:47 -0800 (PST) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.95,623,1384329600"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="94680269" Received: from vmwexceht03-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.241]) by mx11-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 08 Jan 2014 02:21:38 -0800 Received: from SACEXCMBX06-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.9.60]) by vmwexceht03-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.241]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 02:21:38 -0800 From: "Eggert, Lars" To: IETF Thread-Topic: Last Call: (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard Thread-Index: AQHPB81hZzPPQlRcgk6ua2U45NfiYJp7LVMA Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 10:21:37 +0000 Message-ID: <5933BB7D-2D2D-4145-A0B2-E92C8DA25844@netapp.com> References: <20140102151419.4692.48031.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20140102151419.4692.48031.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.106.53.51] Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_36C4746D-8644-40AC-AC97-DAF2E1204EE1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 09:15:22 -0800 Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Call: (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 10:21:50 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_36C4746D-8644-40AC-AC97-DAF2E1204EE1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi, On 2014-1-2, at 16:14, The IESG wrote: > - 'Encapsulating MPLS in UDP' > as Proposed Standard this document needs to describe how it addresses the issues raised in = BCP145 (RFC5405). It already contains some text about messages sizes and = congestion considerations, which is great. Unfortunately, the text about = congestion considerations is not fully in line with RFC5405. Lars --Apple-Mail=_36C4746D-8644-40AC-AC97-DAF2E1204EE1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQCVAwUBUs0msNZcnpRveo1xAQJmVgP/Ru+CWqFvoJjk+SPEXBDvVhBIAafFlril t49xr5u64LhTLeFxjtLGX41P1mitCFWV5euqgi2ixkpxIP9OxfCpMKAqLUF/o6/w GL6hw/fa5gB8yCiOBr3/H4h4HyNNJOGm66i7Y30Q5PhGSPhnr/E5essJBwHq9pZb kO+3844idqY= =2mpd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_36C4746D-8644-40AC-AC97-DAF2E1204EE1--