Re: [mpls] R: IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-rfc6374-sfl

[Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>]

Giuseppe,

I can't give advice on validity of one IPR or another. If you have
knowledge about IPRs that you think are relevant for one IETF document
or another you have to disclose. The fact that it has been disclosed 
against another document is not relevant, a disclosure is necessary for
each document you think it applies to.

/Loa

On 2017-04-27 18:26, Fioccola Giuseppe wrote:
> Hi All,
> I'm one of the co-authors of this draft.
>
> The IPR disclosure, already linked to this document, is the fundamental one.
> There are other IPRs belonging to the same topic: the alternate marking technology (owned by Telecom Italia).
>
> These are already declared on draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark, that is a reference for draft-bryant-mpls-rfc6374-sfl.
> Our draft mentions draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark in some points and explains how to use the alternate marking technology, so all the IPRs should be inherited in addition to the IPR already declared.
>
> Do you think we should declare also the other IPRs on our draft or are these already inherited from draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Giuseppe
>
>
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: Loa Andersson [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Inviato: giovedì 27 aprile 2017 05:32
> A: [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Oggetto: IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-rfc6374-sfl
>
> Working Group,
>
> The author of draft-bryant-mpls-rfc6374-sfl has told us that the document is ready to be considered for working adoption.
>
> The document been through MPLS-RT review. We will do an IPR poll parallel to the start of the adoption poll.
>
> This mail starts the IPR poll.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-bryant-mpls-rfc6374-sfl?
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> There is one IPR disclosure filed directly against this document.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor.
>
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>
> /Loa
> mpls wg co-chair
>

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: [phone]