[mpls] mpls vs IPv6
Jung Janos <jj306@hszk.bme.hu> Tue, 28 September 2004 09:35 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA08761; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 05:35:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CCEW6-0005RF-63; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 05:43:27 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CCEKb-0002GD-4y; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 05:31:33 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CCECD-0001GL-Uy for mpls@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 05:22:53 -0400
Received: from ural2.hszk.bme.hu (IDENT:R/h5giEsFHv/GF/PU72L2J6RUqr6IJ3m@ural2.hszk.bme.hu [152.66.130.2]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA08131 for <mpls@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 05:22:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from jj306@localhost) by ural2.hszk.bme.hu (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) id i8S9Mqb6000670; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:22:52 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:22:51 +0200
From: Jung Janos <jj306@hszk.bme.hu>
X-X-Sender: jj306@ural2
To: mpls@ietf.org
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0409281121560.26661@ural2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Subject: [mpls] mpls vs IPv6
X-BeenThere: mpls@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: mpls-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpls-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e1e48a527f609d1be2bc8d8a70eb76cb
Hi! I have to make some performance mesurement, with IPv6, IPv4, mpls, but first i must find out, if it has a sense. With MPLS I can create MPLS VPNs, QoS can (really?) be granted to packet flows, and routing is more faster. IPv6 has the "Flow label" field wich makes routing faster and has less header overhead than ipv4 (or mpls+ipv4) And i think flow label could have the same use as the mpls label value... How is MPLS to IPv6 related? Are they technologies that have nothing to do with each other? Or MPLS can bring new functionalities to IPv6 networks (like to IPv4), and so mpls+ipv6 would have a sense? And if so, what are the benefits? Or: IPv6 has all what mpls+ipv4 has (separeted flows to support qos VPNs faster routing) and so mpls would have no further use? In the new IPV6 era what role will mpls play? thanks for the answers! and sorry for the bad english regards JJ. (student) _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
- RE: [mpls] mpls vs IPv6 richard.spencer
- [mpls] mpls vs IPv6 Jung Janos
- [mpls] mpls vs IPv6 Jung Janos
- Re: [mpls] mpls vs IPv6 Piotr Marecki
- Re: [mpls] mpls vs IPv6 Erblichs
- Re: [mpls] mpls vs IPv6 Marc Binderberger
- Re: [mpls] mpls vs IPv6 Spice Sylvia
- Re: [mpls] mpls vs IPv6 Marc Binderberger
- RE: [mpls] mpls vs IPv6 Peter Ashwood-Smith
- Re: [mpls] mpls vs IPv6 Spice Sylvia
- Re: [mpls] mpls vs IPv6 Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] mpls vs IPv6 Spice Sylvia
- Re: [mpls] mpls vs IPv6 Erblichs
- Re: [mpls] mpls vs IPv6 David Charlap
- Re: [mpls] mpls vs IPv6 Erblichs
- Re: [mpls] mpls vs IPv6 David Charlap
- Re: [mpls] mpls vs IPv6 Erblichs
- Re: [mpls] mpls vs IPv6 Claus Gruber